1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andriy [413]
3 years ago
13

Consider golfers who led the PGA in winnings at different points in time. Note that the winnings are nominal figures (unadjusted

for inflation). Use the formula for converting nominal values into real values to convert the original U.S. dollar earnings of Nicklaus, Watson, and Woods ('00) to 2009 U.S. dollars. Using those figures, fill in the following table, making sure to round your responses to the nearest U.S. dollar.
Year Golfer Nominal Winnings U.S. Dollars ($) U.S. CPI (1983 = 100) Winnings in 2009 U.S. Dollars ($)
1973 Jack Nicklaus 308,362 44.4
1980 Tom Watson 530,808 82.4
2000 Tiger Woods 9,188,321 172.2
2009 Tiger Woods 10,508,163 214.5 10,508,163
List the four golfers in order from lowest inflation-adjusted winnings to highest.
Business
1 answer:
liberstina [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

4. Tom Watson

3. Jack Nicklaus  

2. Tiger Woods

1.  Tiger Woods

Note: See the attached file for the calculation.

Explanation:

Note: The table in the question is merged. It has been rearranged in the attached file, and the calculation is done in the file using the conversion formula.

The formula for converting nominal values into real values can be stated as follows:

Real value for each year = (Base Year CPI ÷ Nominal Year CPI) × Nominal value for the year

Using after converting the gofers' earnings to 2009 U.S. dollars. we have the following ranks and figures:

4. 1980, Tom Watson = $1,381,776  

3. 1973, Jack Nicklaus = 1,489,722  

2. 2009, Tiger Woods = 10,508,163

1.  2000, Tiger Woods = 11,445,382  

Download xlsx
You might be interested in
Short Corporation acquired Hathaway, Inc., for $53,350,000. The fair value of all Hathaway's identifiable tangible and intangibl
damaskus [11]

Answer:

$0

Explanation:

Based on the information given No annual amortization of goodwill for this acquisition based on the fact that GOODWILL as an asset will remain forever because they won't dilapidate or worn out which is why GOODWILL are not amortized and Secondly we cannot see or touch GOODWILL which is why they are called intangible asset .

Therefore the annual amortization of goodwill for this acquisition will be $0.

5 0
3 years ago
Ty Runt has always taken a hard line against unionization efforts. Two years ago, when workers at his previous company tried to
Margarita [4]
Please let us help with eoy
8 0
4 years ago
You are buying a $62,000 house for 10% down, with the rest financed at 11 3/4% for 30 years with fixed monthly payments. you mus
Kitty [74]
The answer would be 42 percent.
7 0
3 years ago
Cole has a cold. Although the brand-name drug is more expensive than the generic, he buys the brand-name one. Cole is familiar w
Semmy [17]

Answer:

<u>less risk</u>

Explanation:

Note: <u>The question appears to be incomplete. Another similar question has been attached for reference purpose and the answer provided herein is based upon that</u>.

It is common consumer behavior of sticking to a brand name despite another lower cost option providing the same base or constituent. Particularly in case of necessities, the law of demand i.e lower price higher demand fails as consumer would prefer being exposed to lesser risk no matter whatever be the cost.

In the given case, the consumer i.e Cole prefers going with a brand name as it provides him with a higher degree of assurance as the brand has a certain reputation attached to it which the other generic option lacks.

Secondly owing to his familiarity with the drug and it's past usage experience, he has developed brand loyalty apparently.

Thus, Cole's decision is attributable to <u>less risk.</u>

4 0
4 years ago
Partnership incurred $15,000 of organizational costs and $75,000 of startup costs in 2011. JKL may deduct $5,000 each of organiz
barxatty [35]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The cost incurred to startup the business before realization of benefit from the business is called startup cost.

On the other hand organization cost ia a cost which is incurred to organize the business operations.

Startup cost can be amortized over a specific period of time. But the organizational cost is charged when it is incurred, it can not be amortized.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The expected rate of return on Happy Dog Soap's stock over the next year is ---------.
    14·1 answer
  • Rick is an asparagus farmer and the world asparagus market is perfectly competitive. the market price is ​$18 a bundle. rick sel
    6·1 answer
  • Net income will result when a.expenses (credits) = revenues (debits) b.revenues (debits) &gt; expenses (credits) c.revenues (cre
    14·1 answer
  • On the budgeted balance sheet,the number for notes payable will come from the ________.
    10·1 answer
  • When you first started your new business, you were so excited about the large volume of orders you had
    12·1 answer
  • Iz, Lauren, Odd, and Ralph started a T‑shirt company. They can produce any number of T‑shirts at a cost of $ 2 per T‑shirt, both
    6·2 answers
  • The city of New Orleans has 200 advertising companies, 199 of which employ designers of normal ability at a salary of $100,000 a
    15·1 answer
  • Arthur owns a tract of undeveloped land (adjusted basis of $145,000) which he sells to his son, Ned, for its fair market value o
    15·1 answer
  • Lin is making a presentation about road safety and wants to add images of road signs.
    9·1 answer
  • Martin is a credit counselor working with a client, Kim, who is in serious financial trouble. Kim is hesitant because she has a
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!