Based on the following observations, the Malthusian theory was criticized: The population was growing quickly in Western Europe. The availability of food had also grown in the same period as a result of technological advancements. Food production has frequently expanded faster than population growth.
What are some criticisms of Neo-Malthusian theory?
Writers who argue that the Malthusian warnings were exaggerated or premature because the green revolution has significantly increased food production and will be able to keep up with ongoing population expansion have criticized the neo-Malthusian revival.
What are the main arguments against the Malthusian theory?
In essence, Malthus was mistaken about both population growth and technological advancement. Although he did not give an exact estimate, he suggested that in areas with plenty of natural resources (like The New World), the population would typically double every 25 years.
Learn more about Neo-Malthusian theory: brainly.com/question/13291281
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: Sensory deprivation and a lack of experiences can harm the developing brain.
During the development period, the brain would learn to utilize all available parts of our body to enchance our survival mechanism. In this period, creating a sensory deprivation would trick the brain into thinking that we do not possess those sense in the first place, which would prevent the brain from achieving its true potential.
Meiosis produces haploid gametes (ova or sperm) that contain one set of 23 chromosomes. When two gametes (an egg and a sperm) fuse, the resulting zygote is once again diploid, with the mother and father each contributing 23 chromosomes.
Toni is likely to be engaging in major depressive disorder. This
is where an individual is depress and likely to experience symptoms such as
having low energy, low mood, lack of interest, and loss of appetite in which
Toni is likely to be experiencing based on the scenario above.
