Answer:
Report it to the supervisor. ... All health care facilities have the same policies and procedures
Answer:
The Constitution was debated, criticized, and expounded clause-by-clause. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote a series of essays popularly referred to as The Federalist Papers, which supported ratification and attacked the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
Explanation:
The correct answer would be, 4th Amendment.
A police officer learns that Julie and George Hammerstone are growing and selling marijuana out of their home on Stewart Avenue. 4th Amendment limits the officer's actions in regards to searching this home for evidence.
Explanation:
4th Amendment, is basically a constitutional Act in the United States Constitution. This was the part of the Bill of Rights.
This law gives protection to people. According to this law, unlawful searches and seizures are prohibited by the officers in homes, offices, shops, etc. Police cannot search anyone's house, business, etc, without the warrants or a solid cause.
As given in this question, a police officer cannot search George and Julie's house just on a doubt. He must first do the full homework and gather evidence against them and needs to get the search warrant in order to enter their home.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment at:
brainly.com/question/3103560
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
