<span>The estate comprised of a field and indication with various mansions on it. Each mansion helped a cavalier with his guns and mounts. John recognizes that the Nobleman of Champagne was his sovereign master. In fact, John would see himself supporting members collectively among all the Templar that hold their mansions from him. Presently as John continues his estate from the lord, then the gentlemen endure their mansions as the sovereign Lord of John.</span>
The answer needed to fill up the blank space is provided below:
- The managerial tools for <u>assessing current realities</u> include a swot analysis, forecasting, and VRIO analysis.
The process of assessing current realities requires an organization's understanding of what its present capabilities are and what it can do to improve on them.
A SWOT analysis investigates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that the organization is prone to.
Forecasting helps the management to make decisions that will enable them to stay afloat in the future.
The VRIO analysis is another important management tool that can help the business by investigating the value, rareness, imitability, and organization of the business.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/18068310
Answer:antibipolar drugs
Explanation:A person with bipolar disorder have frequent depressed mood which may be associated with manic depression. Usually it takes too many visits to the doctor before healthcare professionals could actual make a dignosis that someone actual has bipolar , depression seems to take over and may cause the person to be diagnosed with other illnesses
The War We Could Have Won
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
WASHINGTON - THE Vietnam War is universally regarded as a disaster for what it did to the American and Vietnamese people. However, 30 years after the war's end, the reasons for its outcome remain a matter of dispute.
The most popular explanation among historians and journalists is that the defeat was a result of American policy makers' cold-war-driven misunderstanding of North Vietnam's leaders as dangerous Communists. In truth, they argue, we were fighting a nationalist movement with great popular support. In this view, "our side," South Vietnam, was a creation of foreigners and led by a corrupt urban elite with no popular roots. Hence it could never prevail, not even with a half-million American troops, making the war "unwinnable."
This simple explanation is repudiated by powerful historical evidence, both old and new. Its proponents mistakenly base their conclusions on the situation in Vietnam during the 1950's and early 1960's and ignore the changing course of the war (notably, the increasing success of President Richard Nixon's Vietnamization strategy) and the evolution of South Vietnamese society (in particular the introduction of agrarian reforms).
For all the claims of popular support for the Vietcong insurgency, far more South Vietnamese peasants fought on the side of Saigon than on the side of Hanoi. The Vietcong were basically defeated by the beginning of 1972, which is why the North Vietnamese launched a huge conventional offensive at the end of March that year. During the Easter Offensive of 1972 -- at the time the biggest campaign of the war -- the South Vietnamese Army was able to hold onto every one of the 44 provincial capitals except Quang Tri, which it regained a few months later. The South Vietnamese relied on American air support during that offensive.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
If the United States had provided that level of support in 1975, when South Vietnam collapsed in the face of another North Vietnamese offensive, the outcome might have been at least the same as in 1972. But intense lobbying of Congress by the antiwar movement, especially in the context of the Watergate scandal, helped to drive cutbacks of American aid in 1974. Combined with the impact of the world oil crisis and inflation of 1973-74, the results were devastating for the south. As the triumphant North Vietnamese commander, Gen. Van Tien Dung, wrote later, President Nguyen Van Thieu of South Vietnam was forced to fight "a poor man's war."
Even Hanoi's main patron, the Soviet Union, was convinced that a North Vietnamese military victory was highly unlikely. Evidence from Soviet Communist Party archives suggests that, until 1974, Soviet military intelligence analysts and diplomats never believed that the North Vietnamese would be victorious on the battlefield. Only political and diplomatic efforts could succeed. Moscow thought that the South Vietnamese government was strong enough to defend itself with a continuation of American logistical support. The former Soviet chargé d'affaires in Hanoi during the 1970's told me in Moscow in late 1993 that if one looked at the balance of forces, one could not predict that the South would be defeated. Until 1975, Moscow was not only impressed by American military power and political will, it also clearly had no desire to go to war with the United States over Vietnam. But after 1975, Soviet fear of the United States dissipated.
U.S. troops withdrew from the country. this is answer
Answer:
1- The proposal would be to improve education in Brazil through full-time school education, where children and teenagers could have different classes and courses, such as courses in foreign languages and professional training, with monetary incentives for children who got good grades.
2- The main challenges foreseen for the inclusion of the integral school in Brazil could be population adhesion, lack of funds and legislative bureaucracy. Such challenges could culminate in school dropouts, lack of resources to hire new professionals, school structure and materials, in addition to a long delay in the approval of the educational change project.
3- The difficulty of solving social problems in any society is a complex task because such problems occur for structural reasons that would impact the way that society organizes itself politically, socially and culturally. There are also institutional problems such as political corruption that makes it difficult to develop a fairer and more egalitarian society for the entire population.
