Answer: Federal Court.
Explanation: The person who commits a federal crime is judged in a Federal Court where he must appear after a series of procedures carried out in advance such as, the lifting of charges by the Office of Prosecutors, the investigation of the suspect and the subsequent arrest, but not before being read their rights as keep quiet during it. After this, in the defendant, several hearings will be held in the Federal Court and finally it can be ruled if he is guilty or innocent of the federal crime of which he is accused.
Answer:
obtaining informed consent from the participants.
Explanation:
Informed consent: The process by which a patient learns about and understands the purpose, benefits, and potential risks of a medical or surgical intervention, including clinical trials, and then agrees to receive the treatment or participate in the trial.
Answer:
The process of identifying and choosing an alternate course of action.
Explanation: decision making process is not really easy. Most times when we come to a dead end what do we do. A good decision making process or a decision maker is expected to know how, when and why it is important to identify and choose an alternative course of action if a current plan is failing. Most decision makers always create and choos an alternative course of action to a particular project being done as at when the project started so not to be stranded Midway. No body plan for failure but when a current plan or project fails, a good decision making process should always make sure to identify various alternative that is better and then choose the best from those alternatives that suit that particular project.
Strategic planning and decision making entails alignment of your priorities with your organizational vision or making decisions that best fit your organizational goals.
The weight is different on the moon but mass is the same don’t get those two confused
Answer:
Un conflicto es una situación en la que dos o más partes tienen intereses contrapuestos, los cuales no se complementan entre sí sino que son antagónicos en su realización. Por lo tanto, cada una de las partes utiliza métodos y se adhieren a valores que en la percepción de las partes son irreconciliables y por tanto chocan.
Ahora bien, el conflicto como tal puede ser el motor para una reconvención de relaciones injustas o negativas. Ello pues las partes (donde generalmente una es la injusta y la otra la que sufre la injusticia) manifiestan sus posiciones en forma de choque, buscando llegar a una solución favorable para ambas, con lo cual suelen ceder en sus pretensiones en la medida que la otra parte también lo haga. Así, muchas veces el conflicto permite destrabar una situación conflictiva, acercando las posiciones de las partes y llegando a un punto de acuerdo.
