Answer: The correct answers are 1-increase pluralistic ignorance 2- less likely to assume it's an emergency situation
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance is a concept in social psychology that refers to a situation in which a group of people reject certain norms or behavior but go along with it because they feel and assume (Sometimes incorrectly) that other people accept it.
Pluralistic ignorance can explain the By-stander effect that leads people to think "if no one is saying anything or doing anything then I'm not going to say or do anything".
In this particular case, Gillian heard a squeal of brakes and a crash. She looks around and notices that no one was affected by that noise and subsequently she stays calm.
Answer:
Africa they were strong supporters of the Pan African movement
<span>The constitutions of the states were somewhat different. Though they all created constitutions that reflected their local beliefs and needs, they also largely kept colonial traditions. For example, the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776 removed property requirements for voting and holding office, while South Carolina's increased the amount of land a white man had to own in order to vote. However, the states generally all lowered the power of their governors and increased the power of their assemblies.</span>
The answer is “Nixon
instituted a lottery system.”
<span>This was instituted by President Nixon during the
Vietnam War. This was one of the best ways to add more people in the military
as volunteer soldiers. However, the lottery system had caused more issues does was
revised.</span>
"<span>Many of the basic ideas that animated the </span>human rights movement<span> developed in the aftermath of the </span>Second World War<span> and the events of </span>The Holocaust, <span>culminating in the adoption of the </span>Universal Declaration of Human Rights<span> in Paris by the </span>United Nations General Assembly<span> in 1948. Ancient peoples did not have the same modern-day conception of universal human rights.</span><span> The true forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept of </span>natural rights<span> which appeared as part of the medieval </span>natural law<span> tradition that became prominent during the European </span>Enlightenment<span> with such philosophers as </span>John Locke<span>, </span>Francis Hutcheson<span>, and </span>Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui<span>, and which featured prominently in the political discourse of the </span>American Revolution<span> and the </span>French Revolution.<span> From this foundation, the modern human rights arguments emerged over the latter half of the twentieth century,</span><span> possibly as a reaction to slavery, torture, genocide, and war crimes,</span><span> as a realization of inherent human vulnerability and as being a precondition for the possibility of a </span>just society."
