Answer: False.
Explanation:
The nature versus nurture debate is strong within psychology.
Nature regards genetic and hereditary determinants that shape people´s physical traits and personality. On the other hand, nurture applies to environmental elements that influence people´s development, such as early childhood events, the way they are raised, their relationships, and their environment.
In this example, Sam´s progress in maths can only be explained by his teacher helping him, meaning that nature had nothing to do with it, but was nurture what allowed that outcome.
Supposing Melissa wants to earn a high salary from her new job she should choose to be a financial analyst at a large corporation. A financial analyst in a large corporation as her vehicle will generate a better income and assures her that she'll be paid for her hard work.
Option A
Cherokee group of North Georgia Indians was forcibly removed from its land after gold was discovered there
<u>Explanation:</u>
U.S. delegations, provoked by the state of Georgia, ousted the Cherokee Indians from their maternal motherland in the Southeast and transferred them to the Indian Region. The extraction of the Cherokees was an outcome of the need for the arable area through the widespread germination of renting in the Southeast, the invention of gold on Cherokee land.
Notwithstanding these works, white characters in Georgia and other southern states that adjoined the Cherokee Nation denied to believe the Cherokee people as cultural peers and pushed their political delegates to clinch the Cherokees' land.
<span>D is the most correct answer. With the availability heuristic, the most recent example of a situation is the one that will stick in a person's mind most readily. With the example of the starving polar bear, Mr. Young is most easily swayed to the extensiveness of climate change than through any information that might have come to him less recently.</span>
