The answer to this question is <span>to employ critical thinking techniques.
Pseudo-psychology tend to not be backed by a valid research to make the theory become reliabe.
With critical thinking techniques, pseudo-psychology could be easily debunked so you wouldn't be trapped within a false mindset to judge the situation that you're currently in</span>
Answer:
This is an example of an experimental design.
Explanation:
Experimental design in research involves controlling the variables in order to prove the hypothesis. In an experimental design there must be an experimental group, that in this case is the group that received an herbal supplement, and a control group, that was only administered placebo. By having a control group, both groups can be measured and compared at the end of the experimental phase, to measure the influence of the independent variable.
<span>It was a middle-of-the-road, pragmatic solution on all fronts, which spoke to much of Lincoln's character and how he ran for the office in the first place. He decided to send provisions to the fort instead of a pre-emptive engagement, and the only reason a battle ensued was because the Confederate army decided to fire on the fort while it was being supplied.</span>
A permanent peace be ever-lasting and one built "upon quicksand" will eventually sink into the sand or as realistically be gone (if this is wrong i apologize)
One, two, and three i think
