Antitrust laws prevent monopolies.
<span>A monopoly is a company or business that dominates a particular market to such an extent that there is no viable competition to that company. </span>
<span>Since a monopoly does not have any other serious competition in a market, the monopoly is at greater liberty to charge higher prices and offer lower-quality prices. </span>
<span>Antitrust laws break up or limit the size of monopolies, allowing other companies to enter a market.</span>
Answer: A - Throughout the course of the trading day, an investor performs several cash transactions in his account which total $12,000.
Explanation: Currency Transaction Reports mandated by Anti-Money Laundering rules require a report to be filed when any of the below stated transactions occur in an account.
1. If the daily aggregate cash transactions of an individual exceeds $10,000
2. if 2 different transactions within a 12 months period seems related and their aggregate exceeds $10,000 must be reported.
3. Any suspicious customers action that suggest that they are laundering money or otherwise violating federal criminal laws and committing wire transfer fraud, check fraud, or mysterious disappearances should be reported
This is an example of "proximal goal".
Proximal objectives are best characterized as here and now and are instrumental in accomplishing distal objectives in which are long haul. The proximal objectives are the giving wellsprings of extra data in regards to exhibitions that isn't uncovered with a distal objective. It is basic that proximal objectives are more sensible to achieve the fulfillment on account of the time hole in getting the objectives. For a complex task, it would not bode well to have distal objectives set up in light of the fact that it at that point would set aside a long span of opportunity to close outcomes in a snappy way.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The quality should be about the same.
The social responsibility should also be about the same.
There shouldn't be side effects of most products. If you are speaking of medications, there really ought to be the same side effects with the same severity and the same statistical occurrences.
The only difference is the company selling the product.
There have been exceptions to this where different "fillers" were used in the generic brand and the side effects were different and more severe. I've only heard of one case however and I cannot remember what it was. Manufacturers were careful not to let it happen again.
