Answer:
amar mata
Step-by-step explanation:
:)
12 cm
Remember, V=Bh
-I think I did the process incorrectly but this is what I did:
900=(10)(15)
900=150 (divide 150 on both sides)
you get 6 but then I multiplied by 2 and got 12.
The answer 12 is correct though so I hope this helped! and if someone could explain the process better that would be great lol.
Answer: Exponents are like the multiplication of a number against itself that many times.
Step-by-step explanation: 2^4=2x2x2x2
3^3=3x3x3
Answer:
The option A) -4-3i is correct
Therefore the simplified given expression is (-1-6i)+(-3+3i)=-4-3i
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the expression is (-1-6i)+(-3+3i)
To simplify the given expression as below :
(-1-6i)+(-3+3i)=-1-6i-3+3i
=(-1-3)+(-6i+3i) ( combining the real parts and imaginary parts separately and adding the like terms )
=-4+(-3i)
=-4-3i
(-1-6i)+(-3+3i)=-4-3i
Therefore the simplified given expression is (-1-6i)+(-3+3i)=-4-3i
Therefore the option A) -4-3i is correct
One-Shot Nash equilibrium is (A, C).
Yes the players can achieve payoffs that are better than the one-shot Nash equilibrium.
This is due to the fact that player 2 will choose strategy C if player A chooses option A. Player 2 will immediately choose Plan C if Player A chooses Option B. As a result, C becomes the second player's dominant strategy. The optimal decision for player 1 is to choose strategy A if player 2 chooses option C. Player 1 will select A if Player 2 chooses to choose D, making this Player 1's dominant move.
A Nash equilibrium is necessary for matrix reward games with two players if the row chosen is to maximize the payoff for the row player given the column chosen by the column player, and the column, in turn, is to maximize the payoff for the column player given the row chosen by the row player.
Learn more about Nash equilibrium:
brainly.in/question/4220195
#SPJ4
