I believe the answer is: valid, but not reliable
A result would be considered as valid if it is created by using proper logical thought or common way of reasoning. But, such result on personality would not be considered to be reliable because there are too many factors that could create a deviation within the data, and there is no accurate way to truly measure personality.
Answer:
C. All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers. That creature up in the sky is certainly flying, so it must also have feathers.
Explanation:
Syllogism is a logical argument with two premises and one conclusion. A categorical syllogism has three propositions which include two premises and one conclusion; a general/major premise, a minor premise and then a conclusion. The major premise,minor premise and conclusion in the above syllogism respectfully are
" All flying creatures I have ever seen have feathers","That creature up in the sky is certainly flying", "so it must also have feathers".
Answer:
Silver atoms share their outer electrons much more freely than
silicon atoms do.
Explanation:
Metals are known to share their outer electrons readily. For this reason metals are known to be electro positive.
Metals are good conductors of electricity because they share their outer electrons readily.
Silver is a metal and silicon is not a metal hence silver is a better electrical conductor
than a strip of silicon because Silver atoms share their outer electrons much more freely than silicon atoms do.
She is likely exhibiting ethnocentrism. This is being
defined as a way of showing judgement towards to other cultures based on their
own standards that they are accustomed of or in their own culture. The American
likely acted that way after seeing crickets to be eaten by locals because it is
not normal or a tradition for their culture to eat bugs or even cover them with chocolates as
they eat it.
