1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lianna [129]
4 years ago
15

Determine the sample size needed to construct a 99​% confidence interval to estimate the average GPA for the student population

at a college with a margin of error equal to 0.7. Assume the standard deviation of the GPA for the student population is 1.0. The sample size needed is nothing. ​(Round up to the nearest​ integer.)
Mathematics
1 answer:
Volgvan4 years ago
3 0

Answer: n = 14

Step-by-step explanation: margin of error = critical value × σ/√n

Where σ = population standard deviation = 1

n = sample size = ?

We are to construct a 99% confidence interval, hence the level of significance is 1%.

The critical value for 2 tailed test at 1% level of significance is gotten from a standard normal distribution table which is 2.58

Margin of error = 0.7

0.7 = 2.58×1/√n

0.7 = 2.58/√n

By cross multipying

0.7×√n = 2.58

By squaring both sides

0.7^2 × n = 2.58^2

0.49 × n = 6.6564

n = 6.6564/0.49

n = 14

You might be interested in
900 × 129 please help me
Anastasy [175]
900 × 126= 116,100. Hoped this helped.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dan drank 3/7 of his water bottle before lunch and 3/7 of his water bottle after lunch. How much water is left?
Wittaler [7]
3/7+3/7= 6/7
7/7-6/7=1/7

Dan had 1/7 of water left

Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Nineteen immigrants to the U.S. were asked how many years, to the nearest year, they have lived in the U.S. The data are as foll
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

a) The frequency of the data "<em>15</em>" and "<em>20</em>" is 2 for both, not 1; this means their relative frequency is 2/19 for both, not 1/19; finally, the cumulative relative frequency in the row of the data "15" should be 0.8947, not 0.8421. This error might have happened because someone didn't count the numbers correctly, so they only noticed one "15" and one "20" when, in fact, there were two people that had lived in the U.S. for 15 years, and two more people for 20 years. On the other hand, the error in the cumulative relative frequency happened because it accounted for only one person living in the U.S. for 15 years, instead of two people.

b) Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. from 0 to 5 years, <em>not </em>for 5 years. The cumulative relative frequency in this row (47%) accounts for every data gathered so far, not just the "5 years" row. The correct statement would be that <em>3 out of 19</em>, or 15.8% (relative frequency) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) First of all, to avoid errors like the one in the problem's table, <em>we should first place the given numbers from least to greatest</em>, so we can construct a new frequency table by ourselves. Let's do just that, and we'll end up with something like this:

0 , 0, 2 , 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 10, 10, 12, 12 , 15, 15, 20, 20

Now we'll have a much easier time from now on.

2) The second step is to <em>construct the Data and Frequency columns</em>. Just place each unique integer in a new row of the <em>Data </em>column, then count how many times that unique integer was found, and, finally, place that number below the <em>Frequency </em>column (<em>Please refer to the Excel Worksheet provided as an attachment). </em>

Let's do it as follows:

Data     Frequency

0            2

2            3

4            1

5            3

7            2

10           2

12           2

15           2

20          2

<em>Note that we counted "15" and "20" twice! So each one of those rows have a frequency of 2, not 1 as the table presented in the problem suggests. </em>

3) Next, we want to construct the Relative frequency and Cumulative relative frequency columns. For the relative frequency column, <em>we just divide the frequency of each row by the total number of immigrants surveyed, which is 19</em>. For the cumulative relative frequency column, <em>we will get each row's relative frequency, and add the cumulative relative frequency of the row before it</em>. Note that for the first row, the cumulative relative frequency is the same as its relative frequency.

We should get something like this:

Data    Frequency    Relative frequency    Cumulative relative frequency

0            2                   2/19                               0.1053

2            3                   3/19                               0.2632

4            1                    1/19                                0.3158

5            3                   3/19                               0.4737

7            2                   2/19                               0.5789

10           2                   2/19                               0.6842

12           2                   2/19                               0.7895

15           2                   2/19                               0.8947

20          2                   2/19                               1.0000

<em>Note that the relative frequency for both "15" and "20" is 2/19 instead of 1/19! Also, we got a cumulative relative frequency of 0.8947 in the row of "15", instead of 0.8421.</em>

4) a) We have just fixed the error in the table, but we have to <em>explain how someone might have arrived at the incorrect number(s)</em>. The most logical way that someone might have gotten the incorrect frequencies of "15" and "20" is that <em>they didn't count the numbers correctly while building the Frequency column</em>. This could have happened because <em>that person probably didn't order the numbers from least to greatest</em>, as we did in Step 1, which makes it way easier to get the frequency of each data without making a mistake.

5) b) We have now to <em>explain what is wrong with the statement "47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years</em>.

To answer that, we can refer to the relative frequency of the row of the data "5", which tells us that 3 out of 19 (or roughly 15.8%) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years. <em>Relative frequency is telling us the percentage of people that have lived for </em><em>this </em><em>amount of time.</em>

By contrast, <em>the cumulative relative frequency of this same row tells us that </em>0.4737, or roughly 47%, of the people surveyed have lived for 5 years or less. Cumulative relative frequency accounts for the data presented in its row, <em>plus </em>the data presented in the rows before it.

So the correct statement would be either:

  • 15.8% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years, or
  • Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years or less.
Download xlsx
7 0
4 years ago
A spinner is divided into five colored sections that are not of equal size: red, blue, green, yellow, and purple. The spinner is
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The probability that the next spin will land on blue is 0.12.

Step-by-step explanation:

The result of the several spins are as follows:

Color           Frequency

Red                  18

Blue                   9

Green               18

Yellow              19

Purple               12

TOTAL             76

Compute the probability that the next spin will land on blue as follows:

P(Blue)=\frac{n(Blue)}{N}\\\\=\frac{9}{76}\\\\=0.1184211\\\\\approx 0.12

Thus, the probability that the next spin will land on blue is 0.12.

4 0
3 years ago
How many minutes are 7 and 10 hour
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

a week and half a dy

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Could someone help me please!?!
    14·1 answer
  • Translation rule to describe the translation of x that is 3 units to the left and 4 units up
    15·2 answers
  • An $80.00 coat is marked down 20%. It does not sell, so the shop owner marks it down an additional 15%. What is the new price of
    7·1 answer
  • Identify a solution to this system of equations:
    13·1 answer
  • if a 6 ft tall lawn ornament casts a 12 ft long shadow then how long is the shadow that a 9 ft tall telephone booth casts
    6·1 answer
  • Last question I need i have gotten everything else please help me if you can​
    10·2 answers
  • M&lt;1=_º<br> 35<br> 50<br> 65<br> Pllzzzz help only serious answers
    15·1 answer
  • Erin buys 4 packs of potatoes costing £2 each, 2 packs of carrots for £3 per pack, and 5 turnips costing 70p each.
    10·1 answer
  • Find the domain and the range of the relation shown on the
    14·1 answer
  • 3+2k= -4(k+4)<br> i need help
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!