A human life is so valuable that no single price should be placed on it. The effect on this stance on bioethical issues however, is relative.
<h3>Relativity of Human value to Bioethical issues</h3>
- A person's stance on a bioethical issue can be based on which human life they value more, the person that will gain, or the one that will be affected.
- With abortion, one might argue that the value of the mother is higher than the baby's because not having to take care of a child will give her a better life.
- Designer babies might be more valuable because their lower rate of birth defects mean that they are tougher and less expensive to maintain.
- Stem cell research could save many lives so more value might be placed on these lives than the embryos affected.
In conclusion, a person can see another life as valuable yet have relative views on bioethical issues.
Find out more on stem cell research at brainly.com/question/5409171.
Answer:
an organism that is able to form nutritional organic substances from simple inorganic substances such as carbon dioxide.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is a gene
Explanation:
The DNA segment that carries information for coding one protein or polypeptide is called a gene. According to one gene-one polypeptide hypothesis, each gene is responsible for making a single chain of the polypeptide.
Originally it was said that one gene codes for one enzyme but later it was found that some gene also codes for non-enzyme proteins and single polypeptide chains. So after this research, the theory was modified and one gene-one polypeptide theory came. Therefore the right answer is gene.
