Answer:
The answer is negative reinforcement.
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, negative reinforcement occurs when an unpleasant stimulus is removed after a behaviour is completed. In the example, the nagging will stop once the job has been done.
Negative reinforcement has been proved to be more effective than positive reinforcement (rewards).
Cheri's conditioned reaction indicates that she retains an implicit memory.
Implicit memory (or unconscious memory) is a long-term memory that can be recalled through the use of past experiences.
If she remembered that she got sick from oatmeal, it would be considered an <em>explicit</em> memory.
According to the quote, it is being said that each state <span>has equal power in congress, and this statement is definitely wrong. Different states - different population, therefore there should be proportion for voting.</span>
Answer:
Group A did not work as hard or as well as group B and would be less likely to spontaneously work on similar puzzles in the future.
Explanation:
Over justification, effect is a psychological phenomenon where people tend to lose interest in an activity when intrinsic motivation is replaced by extrinsic rewards. person not only lose interest in an activity but less likely to engage in that activity. people tend to see that external reward as bribe to do that activity which was earlier they were doing for internal appeasement.
As per the question Group A is externally motivated to do work, it would unlikely that they engage in such a similar activity in the future.
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works but fail in one important area. accounting for knowledge and experience. Option A
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Recognition by components (RBC)?</h3>
Generally, Irving Biederman first suggested the recognition-by-components hypothesis, sometimes known as the RBC theory, in 1987 in an effort to provide an explanation for object recognition.
In conclusion, Both the recognition by components theory (RBC) and the feature integration theory (FIT) do a decent job of describing how perception works, but both of them fall short in one crucial area. taking into consideration one's acquired skills and experience Alternative A
Read more about Recognition by components (RBC)
brainly.com/question/5439846
#SPJ1
complete question
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works, but fail in one important area. What is that area?
A. accounting for knowledge and experience
B. how specific features are used to combine into the objects that we perceive
C. the neurological pathway from the eye to the visual cortex
D. the neurology behind the dorsal and ventral streams
