Some ofthose harmful effects are:
-It makes us refuse to acknowledge other truth beside our religion. This could make us overlook scientific evidence because we're too afraid to become a sinner according to our religion
- If religious enthusiasm exist between two different groups of religion, it often end up in violence in order to proof who are the one that has better beliefs
A direct cause of World War 1 was <span>the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. But because that isn't one of the listed options, I'll have to pick something else.
Alliances were a big cause in the whole thing. Many countries in Europe made agreements with each other. If one country got attacked, the allied countries had to defend them.
So, you can see the whole thing got started. When one nation got into trouble, the other had to help them. Even if they didn't wanted to.
If you would mark this as the Brainliest answer that would be terrific. And for a limited time offer, no joke of scam. You will be receiving your very own helicopter. Yup that's right. When you press that Brainliest answer button, you will see helicopter fly right into your yard.
No, but seriously I'll appreciate it very much if you mark this answer as the Brainliest.</span>
I believe the answer is: scientific stage
In the scientific stage of societal develoment, people start to rely more on empirical evidence to drive their decision rather than religion or any forms of diety. In this stage of development, innovations would start to flourish and society tend to keep inventing things that increase their prosperity.
Answer:
A. Publishing articles that encourage or are likely to lead to violence
Explanation:
The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech in most forms, but when speech promotes violence, or is likely to lead of violence, it becomes illegal speech that is not protected under this Amendment.
For example, a public threatening message to someone is not protected by the First Amendment because such a message is likely to lead to violence against the victim.
Voter turnout is the percentage of eligible voters who participated in a certain election commonly referred to as those who cast ballots.
This can be the proportion of voters who are registered, eligible, or of voting age. Political scientists Adam Bonica and Michael McFaul of Stanford University claim that there is general agreement that "democracies perform better when more people vote. Voting participation rates vary by social class. Significant differences between voters and nonvoters become less pronounced when turnout near 90%, although in elections with lower turnout, these inequalities can still be rather stark. Voter turnout has profound long-term effects on democracies' capacities to function, more so than variations in particular election results. For instance, regulatory capture frequently hinders popular democratic measures like simplifying elections in low-turnout democracies.
learn more about turnout here:
brainly.com/question/29549650
#SPJ4
