Answer:
The inspector's claim has strong statistical evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
To answer this we have to perform a hypothesis test.
The inspector claimed that the actual proportion of code violations is greater than 0.07, so the null and alternative hypothesis are:

We assume a significance level of 0.05.
The sample size is 200 and the proportion of the sample is:

The standard deviation is

The z-value can be calculated as

The P-value for this z-value is P=0.00914.
This P-value is smaller than the significance level, so the effect is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.
The inspector's claim has strong statistical evidence.
Since they are consecutive, we can define the two unknowns with ease.
The left page (has a smaller value) can be defined as X, and the right page can be defined as X+1.
So,
X + (X+1) = 293
2x+1 = 293
2x = 292
x = 146
So, as we defined before, the smaller page number is equal to x. Therefore, the smaller page number is 146, and the larger page number is 147.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
convert the number to all decimals or fraction and compare.
Answer:
12/13
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope this helps!