The greatest common factor is 4.
28/32 / 4 = 7/8
Answer:
-See below
Step-by.step explanation:
In the first column, on the left of the vertical line, you place the first digit of the number , then on the second row on you place the second digit.
So on the second row you have the entries:
1 | 2 2 4 representing 12, 12 and 14.
On the first row the 2 0ne digit numbers 3 and 8 are represented by
0 | 3 8.
Similarly the last 2 rows are:
2 | 0 1 3 6
3 | 4
Answer:
is the expression with value of 15 when n = 7.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the expression whose value is 15, substitute the value of n = 7 in each given expression.
Expression 1:

Substituting the value of n,

Simplifying,

Since the value of the expression is 8 which is not equal 15.
Hence expression
does not have value of 15 when n = 7.
Expression 2:

Substituting the value of n,

Simplifying,

Since the value of the expression is 16 which is not equal 15.
Hence expression
does not have value of 15 when n = 7.
Expression 3:

Substituting the value of n,

Simplifying,

Since the value of the expression is 14 which is not equal 15.
Hence expression
does not have value of 15 when n = 7.
Expression 4:

Substituting the value of n,

Simplifying,

Since the value of the expression is 15 which is equal 15.
Hence expression
has the value of 15 when n = 7.

Notice that

So as

you have

. Clearly

must converge.
The second sequence requires a bit more work.

The monotone convergence theorem will help here; if we can show that the sequence is monotonic and bounded, then

will converge.
Monotonicity is often easier to establish IMO. You can do so by induction. When

, you have

Assume

, i.e. that

. Then for

, you have

which suggests that for all

, you have

, so the sequence is increasing monotonically.
Next, based on the fact that both

and

, a reasonable guess for an upper bound may be 2. Let's convince ourselves that this is the case first by example, then by proof.
We have


and so on. We're getting an inkling that the explicit closed form for the sequence may be

, but that's not what's asked for here. At any rate, it appears reasonable that the exponent will steadily approach 1. Let's prove this.
Clearly,

. Let's assume this is the case for

, i.e. that

. Now for

, we have

and so by induction, it follows that

for all

.
Therefore the second sequence must also converge (to 2).
False here are extra words tho make 20 words