Answer: Positive reinforcement
Explanation:
Positive reinforcement refers to the state of providing the subject with a reward or something whenever they tend to perform action required, so that they can associate this action with reward and therefore tend to do often. This reward is known as reinforcing stimulus. This type of consequence tend to works because in this case the brain frequently connects the desired action with the reward, and thus subject tends to repeat this desired action in order to get the reward in the future.
Answer: In differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA), it is possible for the problem behavior and reinforced behaviour to coexist while in differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI), it is not.
Explanation:
Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) and differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI) are both ways to reduce or eliminate unsatisfactory behavior. They aim to change behavior by substituting unwanted behavior with target behavior and removing the reinforcement of unwanted behavior
.
The difference between DRA and DRI is the compatibility of the behavior that is being reinforced with the existing behavior. While DRA shows an alternative way to behave, DRI only reinforces behavior incompatible with the problem behavior. An example of DRA is is telling a student to raise her hand instead of shouting in class. Here, both of these behaviors are compatible. An example of DRI is telling a child who has a habit of talking while eating to do one or the other.
The roots of the Orthodox Church are in Catholicism.
I am not 100% but I think that answer is C
Answer:
The correct answer is: true
.
Explanation:
The Sinyavsky-Daniel trial was a trial against two Russian writers, Andrei Sinyavsky and Yuli Daniel, for publishing their satirical writings about the Soviet Union abroad.
The trial took place in Moscow, in February 1966, and the writers were sentenced to seven and five years in labor camps.
The writers used fake pseudonyms, Abram Tertz and Nikolai Arzhak, to write about anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda. Their publications – <em>This is Moscow Speaking</em> and <em>The Trial Begins</em> caught the attention of the KGB, so they were arrested in 1965.
