That would be written as:
And the step-by-step equation would be:
→ we take the 2 to the right side of the equation and do the IO*
→we solve for 
→ final answer
*Ps - IO is not an existing term and stands for inverse operation. In this case, because when we take to 2 to the right side of the equation (the 2 is a power) it'll have to turn into a square root (because exponents and roots are inverse operations)
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
Answer:
75 general
105 student ID
Step-by-step explanation:
(it's a system)
4x+3y=615
x+y=180
(system as well)
4x+3y=615
x=180-y
4(180-y)+3y=615
720-4y+3y=615
-y=-105
y=105
x+105=180
x=180-105
x=75
Answer:
We have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses testing procedure in the given scenario is
H0: Husband’s perception would be similar to the wife’s i.e. μh=μw
Ha: Husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s i.e. μh>μw
Level of significance: α=0.05
Test statistic: t=2.776
Critical region: t>t(0.05,9)=1.833
Conclusion: As the calculated value of t lies in critical region, so we reject our null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. Thus, we have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
Answer:
puedes entenderme
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is 91
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the following equality:
Then a must satisfy that 
. So,
or 
.
1) If a=7, then, it follows for the first equality that 56=14b. Then b=4. Finally, substituting b=4 in the first equality we obtain that -64=16-c. So, c= 80. We conclude that
.
As the problem states, we only consider values of a greater than zero. Then 91 is the only solution for 
.
