Answer:
B, you just multiply the exponents, also 3^2=9
Step-by-step explanation:
The best choice would probably be the third option from the top. Since by using the distance formula you can solve for the length or distance of each of the sides of the triangle, and check to see if it is equal. As would be in an equilateral triangle.
Slope wouldn’t be best for the last leg or bottom leg as there is no change in y and x.
Answer:
a) ![\mathrm{E}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{\mathrm{H}}^{5} \frac{200}{101-i}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathrm%7BE%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7B%5Cmathrm%7BH%7D%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B200%7D%7B101-i%7D)
b) ![\mathrm{Var}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{k=1}^{5} \frac{(200)^{2}}{(101-i)^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%28200%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B%28101-i%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
The lifetimes of the individual items are independent exponential random variables.
Mean = 200 hours.
Assume, Ti be the time between ( 
)st and the 
failures. Then, the 
are independent with 
being exponential with rate 
Therefore,
a) ![E[T]=\sum_{i=1}^{5} E\left[\tau_{i}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%5BT%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20E%5Cleft%5B%5Ctau_%7Bi%7D%5Cright%5D)
![\therefore \mathrm{E}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{\mathrm{H}}^{5} \frac{200}{101-i}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctherefore%20%5Cmathrm%7BE%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7B%5Cmathrm%7BH%7D%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B200%7D%7B101-i%7D)
The variance is given by, ![\mathrm{Var}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{i=1}^{5} \mathrm{Var}[T]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5BT%5D)
![\therefore \mathrm{Var}[\mathrm{T}]=\sum_{k=1}^{5} \frac{(200)^{2}}{(101-i)^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctherefore%20%5Cmathrm%7BVar%7D%5B%5Cmathrm%7BT%7D%5D%3D%5Csum_%7Bk%3D1%7D%5E%7B5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%28200%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B%28101-i%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the question :
Jane evaluates x squared minus 3 x + 5 for x = negative 2 below. Step 1: (negative 2) squared minus 3 (negative 2) + 5 Step 2: Equals negative 4 + 6 + 5 Step 3: Equals 7 What, if any, was Jane's mistake?
Jane's evaluation :
x² - 3x + 5 for x = - 2
Step 1:
(-2)² - 3(-2) + 5
Step 2:
-4 + 6 + 5
Step 3 :
= 7
Jane's mistake was in STEP2,
evaluating (-2)² = 4 and not - 4
Hence, (-2)² - 3(-2) + 5
= 4 + 6 + 5
= 15
