<span>This is an example of adapting to a new environment. It is an improved function that is produced by natural selection. They reproduce more often in a new environment because they have the necessary food or climate or both to be able to sustain population growth.</span>
Answer:
a) Head sets - perfect competition
b) Smart phones - monopolistic competition
c) Cellular telephone service - oligopoly
d) Cell phone applications - monopolistic competition
Explanation:
The following definitions explain the categorisation of competition:
- Perfect competition is when many firms sell similar products, no firm or buyer has control of market price. The barriers to entry are low. This is characterised by headsets
- The market for smart phones is monopolistic competition because advertisement is used to create product differentiation with the aim of gaining better market control
- Oligopoly is characterised by few firms controlling the market and keeping each other from dominating the market. This is they type of competition for cellular telephone service.
- Monopolistic competition is one where many firms produce dirlfferentiated products that are not substitutes. This is shown in market for cell phone applications
<span>THE EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF LIMITED RESOURCES MOSTLY BEING FACTORS OF PRODUCTION TO COMPLETE A TASK. SO ALLOCATION EFFICIENCY PLAYS A VITAL ROLE TO ACHIEVE AND BY EQUALIZING CONSUMER SURPLUS AND PRODUCER SURPLUS . IT IS TRUE THAT ALLOCATION EFFICIENCY IS ACHIEVED BY EQUALIZING CONSUMER SURPLUS AND PRODUCER SURPLUS.</span>
Answer:
(a) Refrigeration would be willing to pay a maximum of Rate 36 to gauge division for unit. because its outside purchase price. (b) $30 (c) $40 (d) $35
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
(A) The Refrigeration would be willing to pay a maximum of Rate 36 to gauge division for unit. because its outside purchase price.
(B) If Gauge had excess capacity, The Division's Management set the transfer price would be $30. this is because transfer price be set as sum of Total Outlay cost and Opportunity Cost. So, ($23 + $7) + $0 = $30
(C) iF Gauge had no excess capacity, the transfer price would be $40.
The Calculation of Transfer price is as follows:
($23 + $7) = $30
Add :- ($40 - $23 -$7) = $10
Hence, the transfer Price = $40
(D) If Gauge was able to reduce the variable cost of internal transfers b $5 per unit then Transfer Price Would be $35.
Thus,
The calculation of transfer price is as follows:-
($23 + $7 - $5) = $25
Add :- ($40 - $23 -$7) = $10
The transfer Price = $35
Answer:
$30,870
Explanation:
Sales per unit: 67,200/3,200 = 21
variable expenses per unit : 38,976/3200 = 12.18
.......................
Sales 3500 unit: 21*3500 = 73,500
Variable expenses 3500 units : 12.18*3500 = 42,630
Contribution margin = Sales-Variable expenses = 73,500-42,630
=$30,870
