<span>Arthur was
no beast or monstrous. He was a extremely shy person who ends up being a guardian angel figure for Scout and Jem. He
resembles a man that has been closed in his home for quite a long time however
there is a thoughtfulness and blamelessness about him that misrepresents any of
the silly gossipy tidbits about him that Scout and Jem used to engage in. </span>
Answer:
the answer is <u>pork</u>
Explanation:
Answer:
Cultural clashes, land disputes and criminal acts
Explanation:
The European powers and their colonies enlisted Indian tribes to help them conduct warfare.
Answer:
Stone were used
Bone
Explanation:
Throughout the Paleolithic, humans were food gatherers, depending for their subsistence on hunting wild animals and birds, fishing, and collecting wild fruits, nuts, and berries. The artifactual record of this exceedingly long interval is very incomplete; it can be studied from such imperishable objects of now-extinct cultures as were made of flint, stone, bone, and antler. These alone have withstood the ravages of time, and, together with the remains of contemporary animals hunted by our prehistoric forerunners, they are all that scholars have to guide them in attempting to reconstruct human activity throughout this vast interval—approximately 98 percent of the time span since the appearance of the first true hominin stock. In general, these materials develop gradually from single, all-purpose tools to an assemblage of varied and highly specialized types of artifacts, each designed to serve in connection with a specific function. Indeed, it is a process of increasingly more complex technologies, each founded on a specific tradition, that characterizes the cultural development of Paleolithic times. In other words, the trend was from simple to complex, from a stage of nonspecialization to stages of relatively high degrees of specialization, just as has been the case during historic times.
In the manufacture of stone implements, four fundamental traditions were developed by the Paleolithic ancestors: (1) pebble-tool traditions; (2) bifacial-tool, or hand-ax, traditions; (3) flake-tool traditions; and (4) blade-tool traditions. Only rarely are any of these found in “pure” form, and this fact has led to mistaken notions in many instances concerning the significance of various assemblages. Indeed, though a certain tradition might be superseded in a given region by a more advanced method of producing tools, the older technique persisted as long as it was needed for a given purpose. In general, however, there is an overall trend in the order as given above, starting with simple pebble tools that have a single edge sharpened for cutting or chopping. But no true pebble-tool horizons had yet, by the late 20th century, been recognized in Europe. In southern and eastern Asia, on the other hand, pebble tools of primitive type continued in use throughout Paleolithic times.
The third alternative is correct (C).
This passage shows the social concern of young people with diverse issues such as racial equality, the environment and access to higher education. In this way, it can be said that these young people are politically engaged, concerned with general well-being.
This is especially relevant to note, since we live in a world that offers distinct opportunities for people, depending on their social class, color and country in which they were born.
