It is a completely false statement that an argument can be classical and consensual. The correct option among the two options that are given in the question is the second option. Actually, an <span>argument can be either classical or consensual. It can never be both. I hope that the answer has come to your help.</span>
Question: The Founders of the United States gave much consideration to the division of responsibility between federal and state governments. They strove to strike a balance between an overbearing central government (such as the British government that had ruled them before the Revolution) and an over reliance on local governments (such as the structure of US government under the Articles of Confederation). Many citizens today continue to debate the correct balance between federal and state government.
What is your position? Name some areas of conflict where you think the powers are improperly balanced. Name some areas where you think the balance works well.
Explanation:
When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so. Both of these situations can be good or bad.
For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense. At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.
It was a idea made by President Woodrow Wilson to form a nation of sovereignty.<span />
Answer:
Confucianism teaches how to act toward others; Daoism teaches how to act toward oneself and nature.
Explanation:
Confucianism and Daoism are two of the most popular philosophies or ideologies that are followed even today, not only by the number of followers native to Asia, but also by many other people around the world.
While they have some religious elements in common, the two philosophies seem to contradict each other at first sight. However, seeing it differently, between these two ideologies, methodologies of human thought seem to be intertwined with respect to everything; which leads to certain defined codes of conduct.
In spite of everything, the two philosophies differ in some things. Above all, Confucianism is more earthly. As such, it focuses on the social aspect of man and his daily life. As Confucius said, philosophy is inherently the social creature that has the ability to be good. You become someone superior if you behave in the way society expects to keep in harmony.
Daoism is different, because it goes beyond this world. The main idea of this philosophy is to embrace the Dao (the greatest reality that is composed of the universe and everything else). It also focuses on the person's relationship with himself to achieve inner harmony. Therefore, it is well to say that in Confucianism the person achieves self-improvement by relating to his immediate external environment, while Daoism proposes that this overcoming is achieved from oneself; that is, internally.
