Answer:
The contract is void since it attempts to contract for services that are illegal
Explanation:
Since there is a contract between the Mr Green and Mr Blue and they already know that the Mr blue has already caught the number of crabs i.e permitted in the season but they agree to exceed the quota
Therefore the status should be void as they want to exceed which is not permitted that results in illegal service contracts
Hence, there is a void contract
Answer:
$65.37
Explanation:
Calculation for how much are you willing to pay today to purchase one share of the company's stock
Using this formula
P/0 = D0 ( 1 + g ) / R-g
Let plug in the formula
P/0 = $2.60 (1 + .056) / .098 - .056
P/0 = $2.60 (1 .056)/0.042
P/0=$2.7456/0.042
P/0=$65.37
Therefore how much are you willing to pay today to purchase one share of the company's stock will be $65.37
The standard deviation of sample equals: 11
Explanation:
Given:
variance of sample (
) = 121
no, of observations made = 441
standard deviation = ?
By using the formula:
Standard deviation (S) = ![\sqrt{variance}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7Bvariance%7D)
= ![\sqrt{S}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7BS%7D)
= ![\sqrt{121}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7B121%7D)
= 11
Hence the standard deviation is equal to 11.
These consider many variables simultaneously and weight these according to a scheme that mirrors societal perceptions. It is a rating scale made up of several items, each of which is a separate question or statement that must be evaluated. Subjects will be able to explain their feelings about many aspects of their professions using a multi-item measure.
This will considerably increase the measure's precision and validity. As a result, multi-item measures are among the most essential and widely utilized tools in social research. Multiple-item scales are intended to sample a broader range of interpretations in order to capture the entire spectrum of a construct.
To learn more about multi-item, click here.
brainly.com/question/14407306
#SPJ4
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
The Dominant Strategy in a game is the strategy that a player will choose that will provide them with the highest payoff regardless of what the other player does.
In the above, the dominant strategy will be for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT.
By choosing left Raphael makes a payoff of 4 if Susan picks Left as well and a Payoff of 6 if Sudan picks Right. This is better than him picking Right and he will get a Payoff of 3 if Susan chooses Right as well.
The Nash Equilibrium is the strategy where both are making the best that they can given the strategy of the other player and deviating from it will give them less pay out.
The dominant strategy therefore is for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT and for SUSAN to choose RIGHT.
This is because Raphael will pick Left as it maximises their payoff and Susan will then pick a strategy that gives her the highest payoff based on Raphael's decision which is to go RIGHT.