Answer:
The judicial branch was granted the power of judicial review
Explanation:
What elevated the judiciary to equal standing is that "The judicial branch was granted the power of judicial review."
This is evident in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where the Supreme Court affirmed the Supreme Court's right to carry out a judicial review which can overrule any government activity including executive, judicial or legislative if such activity is seen or interpreted to be unconstitutional.
The Chief of Staff.
All of the advisers listed in your question have important roles to play, but the White House Chief of Staff is continually in contact with the President, and so would be the one more likely to have insight into the personal thoughts of the president. The Chief of Staff controls the flow of other persons into the Oval Office for time with the President. The Chief of Staff also serves as an adviser to the President and a negotiator for him with other members of the government. The Chief of Staff is the person most often at the President's side. Also, whereas Cabinet officials and the National Security Adviser advise the President on issues specific to their appointed roles, the Chief of Staff is involved in the President's planning and communication in regard to all issues of the administration.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
B. disgust and surprise
Explanation:
Scott and Smith (2010) were able to study the universal emotions through different cultural environments, they were able to describe the emotions that can be found no matter the place in the world or the cultural background of the implied ones in the experiment, the sensations or feelings were commonly found in the participants. The emotions that they found in common among all the participants included fear anger, joy, happiness, disgust and surprise, besides they also mention in the study the sensation of sadness.
The ability to roll the edges of the tongue upward in a U-shape has been considered to be an inherited ability. The standard assumption is that tongue-rolling is a dominant allele at a single gene locus. Which of the following would cast doubt on this assumption?
A)A teacher reports that after testing her class on the ability to roll their tongue, with very little effort the non-tongue-rollers can learn to also roll their tongues.
B)A student who can roll his tongue has a mother and father, both of whom cannot. C)A student who cannot roll his tongue has a mother and father, both of whom can.
D)The non-tongue rollers who learn to roll their tongues and the student who can roll his tongue while his parents cannot are two situations that cast doubt on the heritability issue. The situation where a student cannot roll his tongue while his parents can is inconclusive.
E)Behaviors are not inherited, only structures are inherited.
Answer:
D)The non-tongue rollers who learn to roll their tongues and the student who can roll his tongue while his parents cannot are two situations that cast doubt on the heritability issue. The situation where a student cannot roll his tongue while his parents can is inconclusive.
Explanation:
This is because non tongue rollers who learn to roll their tongues appears to negate the idea of tongue rolling ability to be inherited ability, while also the fact that non tongue rollers having parents who cannot roll their tongues also prove the idea that tongue rolling ability is hereditary.
Hence, the option D)The non-tongue rollers who learn to roll their tongues and the student who can roll his tongue while his parents cannot are two situations that cast doubt on the heritability issue. The situation where a student cannot roll his tongue while his parents can is inconclusive, will surely cast doubt on the assumption, that rolling of tongue is an ability that is hereditary
