The answer is actually choice A
---------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
If we add up the equations straight down we will have 0a+2b = 6
Note how adding the 'a' terms gives us 3a + (-3a) = 3a-3a = 0a. The 0a term is really 0 since 0 times anything is 0. So the 'a' terms will go away
The equation 0a+2b = 6 turns into 0+2b = 6 and that simplifies to 2b = 6
To isolate b, we divide both sides by 2
2b = 6
2b/2 = 6/2
b = 3
We can stop here since only one answer choice has b = 3, which is choice A. However, let's keep going to find the value of 'a'
Plug b = 3 into any equation with 'a' and 'b', then solve for 'a'
3a+4b = 9
3a+4*3 = 9
3a+12 = 9
3a+12-12 = 9-12
3a = -3
3a/3 = -3/3
a = -1
So a = -1 and b = 3 pair up to form (a,b) = (-1,3)
--------------------------------------
To check, plug this ordered pair back into both equations
Equation 1:
3a+4b = 9
3*(-1)+4*3 = 9
-3+12 = 9
9 = 9
Equation 1 has been checked out
Equation 2:
-3a-2b = -3
-3(-1)-2(3) = -3
3 - 6 = -3
-3 = -3
this is true as well
So this confirms that the final answer is choice A
I don't know what is the correct answer
Answer:
(A)Decay
(b)0.8
(c)First Term
(d)
(e)$819.20
Step-by-step explanation:
The exponential function for modelling growth or decay is given as:
,
Where:
Plus indicates growth and minus indicates decay.

For a powerful computer that was purchased for $2000, but loses 20% of its value each year.
(a)Since it loses value, it is a decay.
(b)Multiplier
Its value decays by 20%.
Therefore, our multiplier(1-r) =(1-20&)=1-0.2
Multiplier =0.8
(c)$2000 is our First term (or Initial Value
)
(d)The function for this problem is therefore:

(e)Since we require the worth of the computer after 4 years,
t=4 years

Answer:
7.) m = 1/3 ; b = -2.5
8.) m = 2 ; b = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
For m, either do the rise over run method or use 2 points and do (y2-y1)/(x2-x1).
For b, just look at the y-intercept/where it crosses the y axis
I believe those are the right answers but not too sure because the numbers on the graph are a bit blurry so i just assumed it counted by ones.