Regretfully, I do not know what is asked of the problem because it is not stated above. However, it is easier to answer any question pertaining to the temperature, volume, and pressure of gases by assuming that they behave ideally. With this, we'll be able to use the ideal gas law which is mathematically expressed as,
PV = nRT
where P and V are pressure and volume, respectively. n is the amount of material in mol, R is gas constant, and T is temperature.
Answer:
12.5 g of Li are needed in order toproduce 0.60 moles of Li₃N
Explanation:
The reaction is:
6Li(s) + N₂(g) → 2Li₃N(s)
If nitrogen is in excess, the lithium is the limiting reactant.
Ratio is 2:6
2 moles of nitride were produced by 6 moles of Li
Then, 0.6 moles of nitride were produced by (0.6 .6)/ 2 = 1.8 moles of Li
Let's convert the moles to mass → 1.8 mol . 6.94 g/ 1mol = 12.5 g of Li
According to the bohr model "The lower energy level into which the electron deflects from a higher energy level is designated by the quantum number nf" determines the shortest wavelength in a given series of wavelengths emitted by the atom.
By explaining that electrons move in fixed orbitals (shells) and not anywhere in between, Bohr theory amended the atomic structure model.
He also showed that each orbit (shell) has a fixed energy. Bohr refined Rutherford's model of the atom's nucleus to include electrons and their varying energy levels.
According to Rydberg formula
1/λ = R [1/ni² - 1/nf²]
λ = wavelength
R = Rydberg constant
ni & nf are integers or principal quantum numbers where nf > ni
So if we want wavelength(λ) to be shortest, then 1/nf should be zero.
In this way , it depends on nf and not on ni
That's why the lower energy level into which the electron deflects from a higher energy level is designated by the quantum number nf" determines the shortest wavelength in a given series of wavelengths emitted by the atom.
Learn more about Bohr's model here brainly.com/question/18002213
#SPJ4
Magnesium salt is the type of substance
Answer:
Our Solar System may be home, but researchers are now discovering that it's not really much like the other kids. According to a survey of 909 planets orbiting 355 stars, our home planetary system is a little on the dishevelled side - and others are a lot more orderly.
Explanation: