1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
11

Use two 2-Column proofs to show that either diagonal of a rectangle will create two congruent triangles?

Mathematics
1 answer:
tangare [24]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Given: Rectangle ABCD 
Prove: ∆ABD≅∆CBD 
Solution:
                      
           <span> Statement                                       Reason 
</span>
  ABCD is a parallelogram          Rectangles are parallelograms since the                                                          definition of a parallelogram is a quadrilateral                                                    with two pairs of parallel sides.

Segment AD = Segment BC       The opposite sides of a parallelogram are     Segment AB = Segment CD       congruent. This is a theorem about the                                                              parallelograms.

</span>∆ABD≅∆CBD                             SSS postulate: three sides of ΔABD is                                                           equal to the three sides of ∆CBD<span>


</span><span>Given: Rectangle ABCD 
Prove: ∆ABC≅∆ADC
</span>Solution:
                      
           <span> Statement                                       Reason 
</span>
    Angle A and Angle C                 Definition of a rectangle: A quadrilateral     
        are right angles                      with four right angles.

        Angle A = Angle C                 Since both are right angles, they are                                                                  congruent

Segment AB = Segment DC       The opposite sides of a parallelogram are     Segment AD = Segment BC       congruent. This is a theorem about the                                                              parallelograms.

            ∆ABC≅∆ADC                   SAS postulate: two sides and included                                                         angle of ΔABC is congruent to the two                                                         sides and included angle of ∆CBD
You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
one tennis club charges $30 per session to play tennis.another tennis club charges an annual fee of $48 plus $22
Tresset [83]

Answer: Dear Stella, I love you

Step-by-step explanation:

I've loved you ever since the first time I saw you but I was too much of a coward to express this love. and if you report this i understand... because it means you dont love me back and that will be okay because I will just jerc off to you changing in your bedroom. thats right i watch you cause I love you.

8 0
2 years ago
Find the area between y=(x-2)ex and the x-axis from x=2 to x=4.
mojhsa [17]

Answer:

e^4+e^2

Step-by-step explanation:

It can be found by integral.

First let's find the intersection points.

(x-2)e^x = 0

Only intersection point is x = 2.

And it is asked to find the area in the interval (2, 4).

\int\limits^4_2 (x-2)e^x \,dx=?

We will use integration by parts.

x-2=u\\dx=du\\e^xdx=dv\\e^x=v

\int\limits^4_2 (x-2)e^x \,dx=uv-\int vdu=(x-2)e^x-\int e^xdx=(x-2)e^x-e^x=\\\\=(x-3)e^x|^4_2=(4-3)e^4-(2-3)e^2=e^4+e^2

3 0
3 years ago
Classify the triangle if two angles in the triangle measure 40 and 50°.​
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

Right Triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's find the missing angle:

180 - (40 + 50)

180 - 90 = 90°

So we have a right triangle!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I don’t understand what the answer is
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

3.14

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A firefighter places a 29 feet ladder, so that the base of the ladder is 21 feet from the wall. What is the height at which the
    13·1 answer
  • What is the sum of the interior angles of the polygon shown below?
    14·2 answers
  • Please help i dont know how to answer this
    11·1 answer
  • If i have 2 lemons and i give 1 away. how many do i have now?
    11·1 answer
  • Plzz help in 3rd part of question 3​
    6·1 answer
  • How many cubes will be needed to construct the 5th "building" in the same pattern?
    10·1 answer
  • Which is the lower rate?<br> 44 people in 4 theaters or 100 people in 10 theaters
    7·1 answer
  • RIGHT ANSWER GETS BRAINLIST WORTH 20 POINTS!!
    12·1 answer
  • A student says that if 5x2 = 20, then x must be
    6·1 answer
  • Veronica needs blinds for the window in her bedroom. the window is 2 meters tall and 4 meters wide. what is the area of the wind
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!