m∠A + m∠B = 90
(3x + 5) + (2x - 15) = 90
(3x + 2x) + (5 - 15) = 90
5x - 10 = 90
+ 10 + 10
5x = 100
5 5
x = 20
m∠A = 3x + 5
m∠A = 3(20) + 5
m∠A = 60 + 5
m∠A = 65
m∠B = 2x - 15
m∠B = 2(20) - 15
m∠B = 40 - 15
m∠B = 25
The deepest point of the lake is -922, so to get to the surface of the lake you would need to add 922 feet.
The deepest point of the lake is 11,542 feet above sea level.
To find the surface of the lake add 922 to 11,542.
11542 + 922 = 12,464 feet
For 5, what is happening is all the points shift down negative 2 on the Y axis and then flip over the x axis.
For 6, it would flip over the Y axis and start at positive 1 x the opposite
Example 1:
The pros of Orthographic is that they can show hidden details and all of the connecting parts, they can be annotated to display material and finishes. The pros of Isometric projection is that they dont need many views and it gives accuracy, cons are is created a unorginized apperance by the lack of foreshortening, I would choose Isometric projection because it shows the size of the figure.
Example 2:
Orthographic projection is a good option for showing lots of detail and small things. The limitation is that with all of that detail, they can become quite messy and hard to understand to someone new to them. However, that is one of the pros of Isometric projection. It gives easy detail and is just as good as an Orthographic. Personally, I find Isometric projections easier to interpret.
