I believe the answer is: <span>reaction formation
</span>reaction formation refers to a situation when a person give an exact opposite response to his/her own <span>own disturbing or socially unacceptable thoughts or emotions. Reaction formation acted as a defense mechanism to repel the anxiety that come by negative perception of ourself.</span>
The correct answer is animism.
According to Piaget's theory of cognitive development, up to age five, children in the preoperational stage of development believe that inanimate objects such as toys, tables, blankets or dolls are "alive", and capable of having intentions and feelings, conversations, moving around freely, etc., just like humans and animate beings.
The nurse is assessing eye alignment in a 6-year-old child. A cover test is most appropriate.
A cowl takes look at is a watch examination that determines if an affected person has any ocular deviation. basically, the check is measuring eye alignment and seeking to figure out whether or not one eye is operating tougher than the opposite is. during a cover test, one eye is included even as the opposite eye specializes in an item inside the room.
it's miles to be achieved even as the patient wears any relevant ordinary correction. For example, if the affected person most effectively wears glasses for distance, perform distance trying out with the glasses on, then do away with the glasses for close to checking out. Educate the affected person to study the target and preserve it clean.
Masking one eye and then getting rid of the cover is most suitable. A "cover test" allows a deviated eye to wander while protected and straighten while uncovered. Eye checks require the kid to stare at the mark. Neurological exams have the kid touch the finger to the nurse. bright lighting, directed at the eyes, test student reaction.
Learn more about the cover eye test here brainly.com/question/28158696
#SPJ4
Both focus on inequalities and conflict as central features of modern societies. Hope this helps!
I think the answer would be the 2nd one because the last two options are just assumptions and it's not using the graph. Also for the first answer, Japan had invested more in education China so that statement doesn't make sense.
I could be wrong but that would be what I would choose
