1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oduvanchick [21]
3 years ago
10

Suppose you believe you have been the victim of age discrimination in your job. To win a lawsuit against your employer, what wou

ld you need to show?
a.) that the employer's policies disproportionately harmed you and that the policies had no reasonable basis

b.) that the employer's policies were intentionally harmful to you

c.) that the employer's policies caused you severe psychological harm

d.) that the employer's policies constituted long-standing practices with no reasonable basis
Law
1 answer:
Zepler [3.9K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the answer would be (C) since its make some logic sense

Explanation:

cause look it at this way C make's sense too me

You might be interested in
Critical thinking is useless today with the internet?
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

not true, If the internet shut down we think how to fix it...

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do hate crimes go unreported
tino4ka555 [31]
Every crime may have a chance to either go reported unreported.
Reason being is most crimes are private and everything discussed about a crime stays in the court room.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think it was important for congress to finish what they started?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

it depends

Explanation:

you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.

if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following happens at trial court but NOT at an appellate court?
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

A. Lawyers make arguments.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How can the judiciary balance individual rights with the common good?
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

In simple words, In order to reconcile human rights with both the common interest, the courts must determine each circumstance on a scenario-by-case basis, bearing into consideration democratic values, existing statutes and previous Supreme Court and other tribunals decisions.

In America, our Constitution and other founding documents grant certain human freedoms or civil liberties. America's founders, including Thomas Jefferson as well as James Madison, intentionally placed these freedoms throughout the Bill of Rights because the government might consider it quite challenging to abrogate them.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Punitive damages are: a. generally not available in tort cases. b. often awarded in cases of contract interference. c. only avai
    9·1 answer
  • Which other qualifications must a citizen meet before he or she can serve on a jury?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following cannot be considered a benefit of implementing HACCP?
    6·2 answers
  • What is a constitution in government?
    8·1 answer
  • Which part of the Constitution is the basis for this diagram?
    5·2 answers
  • Gold SCAR make them ladies wet
    8·1 answer
  • How did watching the debate extend or broaden your thinking about the candidates and the campaign? What new information did you
    12·1 answer
  • Question # 11
    10·1 answer
  • Abdel fields vs United States explained
    8·1 answer
  • What factors influence the supreme court’s decision-making practices?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!