Answer:D
Explanation: Contact inhibition is a process of arresting cell growth when cells come in contact with each other. As a result, normal cells stop proliferating when they form a monolayer in a culture dish. Contact inhibition is a powerful anticancer mechanism that is lost in cancer cells
Answer:
Explanation:
Survivors usually get rid of toxins and other chemicals found in refined food, and stayed away from ingredients that may be responsible for cancer growth. High fruits and vegetables intake is also a must for them. Furthermore, a lot of survivors made sure that they do something each day that made them happy, even just for a few minutes. Another common factor is having powerful reasons to stay alive. There are terminally ill people who are saying they don’t want to die, however, those people who tend to survive actually say they want to live and they will do anything just to live.
The proportion of days for which the process will shut down for both broth x and broth in the distribution are 2.28 days and 3.34 days.
<h3>How to compute the number of days?</h3>
Mean ( u ) =4.9
Standard Deviation ( sd )=0.6
Normal Distribution = Z= (x - u)/SD
a. P(X > 6) = (6-5.2)/0.4
= 0.8/0.4 = 2
= P ( Z >2)
From the standard normal table.
= 0.0228 = 2.28 days
Broth x = 2.28 days
P(x > 6) = (6-4.9)/0.6
= 1.1/0.6 = 1.8333
= P ( Z >1.833)
From the standard normal table
= 0.0334 = 3.34 days
Broth y = 3.34 days.
The recommendation to the manager as to the broth that should be bought is broth x since it requires lesser days
Learn more about normal distribution on:
brainly.com/question/4079902
#SPJ1
Vaccines are the most efficacious means of minimizing the impact of infectious diseases on the human population. The challenges and importance of making vaccines that will meet FDA approval have never been greater. Genomics has the potential to improve the process of vaccine development substantially. Genome sequencing can help to identify genetic patterns related to the virulence of a disease, as well as genetic factors that contribute to immunity or successful vaccine response. All this information could lead to vaccines with better and more specific targets that elicit more successful protective immune responses. Comparing the genome sequences of viruses that cause infection with those that do not may provide additional insights. In turn, genome manipulation can facilitate derivation of attenuated strains or other vehicles for delivery of the desired antigens to stimulate immune response. On the other end of the spectrum, analysis of host diversity can reveal effective immune responses and possibly the genetic basis for inappropriate response. The recent progress in definition of the innate immune system, necessary for acquired response, should facilitate the definition of this host diversity.