Answer:
$4
Step-by-step explanation:
2 Bracelets + 3 rings = $26
2 rings = $12
3 rings = x
To get the cost of 1 ring you divide 12 by 2 and the answer you get is 6.
The total cost of the 3 rings is $18( $6*3)
Then you subtract the cost of both 2 bracelets and 3 rings($26) from the cost of 3 rings($18). The answer is $8. ( THIS IS THE COST OF 2 BRACELETS)
<u>1 BRACELET= $4( $8/2)</u>
Answer:
The value of x that maximizes the volume enclosed by this box is 0.46 inches
The maximum volume is 3.02 cubic inches
Step-by-step explanation:
see the attached figure to better understand the problem
we know that
The volume of the open-topped box is equal to

where

substitute

Convert to expanded form

using a graphing tool
Graph the cubic equation
Remember that
The domain for x is the interval -----> (0,1)
Because
If x>1
then
the width is negative (W=2-2x)
so
The maximum is the point (0.46,3.02)
see the attached figure
therefore
The value of x that maximizes the volume enclosed by this box is 0.46 inches
The maximum volume is 3.02 cubic inches
Answer:
1/sqrt10
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Find out cosA using formula (cosA)^2+(sinA)^2=1
The module of cosA= sqrt (1- (-3/5)^2)= sqrt 16/25=4/5
So cosA=-4/5 or cosA=4/5.
Due to the condition 270degrees< A<360 degrees, 0<cosA<1 that's why cosA=4/5.
2) Find sinA/2 using a formula cosA= 1-2sinA/2*sinA/2 where cosA=4/5.
(sinA/2)^2= 0.1
sinA= sqrt 0.1= 1/ sqrt10 or sinA= - sqrt 0.1= -1/sqrt10
But 270°< A< 360°, then 270/2°<A/2<360/2°
135°<A/2<180°, so sinA/2 must be positive and the only correct answer is
sin A/2= 1/sqrt10
3(x + 7) = 9(x - 1)
3(x) + 3(7) = 9(x) - 9(1)
3x + 21 = 9x - 9
<u>- 3x - 3x </u>
21 = 3x - 9
<u>+ 9 + 9</u>
<u>30</u> = <u>3x</u>
3 3
10 = x
Answer:
The given expression is equivalent to -x
That is 
Now Verified that the two expressions are equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Genevieve wants to verify that One-fifth (5 x minus 20) minus one-half (4 x minus 8) is equivalent to Negative x
It can be written as below :

Now we can verify the expression is equivalent or not :
Taking LHS

( by using the distributive property )

( adding the like terms )
=RHS
Therefore LHS=RHS
Therefore the given expression is equivalent to -x
That is 
Now Verified that the two expressions are equivalent