A triangle is the best because it is sturdy. There is no "wiggle room" for the triangle to transform into another shape.
let "a number" = x
a number is divided by 3 => x/3
14 is added to the quotient => (x/3) + 14
The result is 33 => " = 33"
Solve for x
(x/3) + 14 = 33
Isolate the x. Note the equal sign. What you do to one side you do the other.
Subtract 14 from both sides
(x/3) + 14 (-14) = 33 (-14)
x/3 = 19
Isolate the x. Multiply 3 to both sides
x/3(3) = 19(3)
x = 19(3)
x = 57
57 is your original number
hope this helps
F(5) = - 2f(4) + 1
f(4) = -2f(3) + 1
f(3) = -2f(2) + 1
f(2) = -2f(1) + 1
Therefore:
f(2) = -2(3) + 1 = -5
f(3) = -2(-5) + 1 = 11
f(4) = -2(11) + 1 = -21
Therefore f(5) = -2(-21) + 1 = 43
Answer:
yes the anwer is A
Step-by-step explanation:
The appropriate response is B. The contend that there is no requirement for understudies to utilize a compass and straightedge, and every single geometric development ought to be finished utilizing a drawing program is the wrong explanation since the power to control drawing programs is just open in a few spots. Not everyone would have the capacity to learn geometry in light of the fact that not everyone can have power. Everyone on the planet would not have a similar opportunity to learn geometry if just drawing programs had the information that we have today.
