Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
I think the answer is D. Socioeconomically disadvantaged children may experience limitations in intellectual development for all of the following reasons except they are exposed to adequate role models. Being exposed to role models, would not limit the development of these children rather it increases it. So, it should be the answer.
Answer:
c. a personal fable.
Explanation:
Personal fable: In psychology, the term personal fable was introduced by Ginsberg, Elkind, and Alberts and is defined as the deduction related to the imaginary audience. An individual feels that he or she is the center of attention because the person believes that he or she is unique and special.
The personal fable is mostly acquired by adolescence as they believe that they can face any difficulty and problems and hence it will not affect them irrespective of their behavior.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the personal fable.
Answer:
she took them to the pizza palace and they said that they were at the pizza place. she is supporting the Panthers' statement by saying she drove them personally to the pizza place, so they couldn't of been at the school that day.
Explanation:
Answer: Russia
Explanation: because the Germans plan to attack Russia because they decided to attack first to maintain the initiative. but Germany knows that they knew that France would honor the alliance with Russia a war on two fronts
