Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
1.4 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine area we multiply height X width
2 X .7 = 1.4
Pattern A starts with 20 and substracts 3
First number = 20
Second number = 20 - 3 = 17
Third number = 17 - 3 = 14
Fourth number = 14 - 3 = 11
Pattern B starts with 10 and adds 2
First number = 10
Second number = 10 + 2 = 12
Third number = 12 + 2 = 14
Fourth number = 14 + 2 = 16
Now join pattern A and B
First combination = (20,10)
Second combination = (17,12)
Third combination = (14, 14)
Fourth combination = (11, 16)
The answer is d. (20,10), (17,12), (14,14), (11,16)
He is not making a valid inference because he is assuming the student populations interest based on a small part/ group of the student population, his class.
Answer:
10 yellow marbles
Step-by-step explanation:
(y is the amount of yellow marbles)
y=2x-2
y=2(6)-2
y=12-2
y=10
