Answer:
With a correlation coefficient of 0.109 you can not be confident at all; this is about as close to a random guess you could get.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lines of best fit are used to try to make a correlation (relationship) about data that will either be positive (uphill), negative (downhill) or no correlation (points are scattered). Correlation coefficients based off of a line of best fit will fall between -1 and +1 where -1 would represent a perfect negative relationship and +1 would represent a perfect positive relationship. A correlation coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no relationship. So, if your data shows a correlation coefficient of 0.109, which is closest to 0 on a number line, then you can't be sure that your data has a very close relationship.
<span>The probability of the event that will not occur is 0.73.
</span>
Answer: m=−3
Step-by-step explanation: −40−2(3m+1/2)=7m−2
−40+(−2)(3m)+(−2)(1/2)=7m+−2
−40+−6m+−1=7m+−2
(−6m)+(−40+−1)=7m−2
−6m+−41=7m−2
−6m−41−7m=7m−2−7m
−13m−41+41=−2+41
−13m/−13=39/−13
m=−3
What mistake I guess Keith did make is he subtracted 2 from -39 which equaled to -37 which caused him divide -37 by 13 when it should have been 39 divided by 13 because he should have left 39 alone and not have subtracted 2 from it also it should not have been negative basically what I'm trying to say is that he did his division and subtraction wrong.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4(5-2)+(-7)(0.5)
20-8+(-3.5)
12-3.5
8.5
Answer:
The equation is always false.
False
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps, If it did, then I would really appreciate it if you gave me Brainliest, I only need one more to rank up and it has taken forever to get to where I am currently. Thanks.
