All categories

3 years ago

Find the circumference of the larger circle if the area of one of the smaller circles is 48 pi in^2.

Mathematics

2 answers:

Alik [6]3 years ago

8 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Given two circa inscribed side by side inside a big circle, it is notice that the internal two circle are identical and diameter of the one the internal circles is equal to the radius of the big circle

So, we are given the area of one of the small circle, so from their we can find the radius of the small circle.

Area of small circle

A = 48π in²

Area of a circle is given as πr²

A = πr²

48π = πr²

Divide both side by π

48 = r²

Take Square root of both sides

r = √48 = √(16 × 3)

r = 4√3 in

Then, the diameter of the small circle is

d = 2r = 2 × 4√3

d = 8√3

So, the radius of the big circle is

R = d = 8√3

So, we want to find the perimeter of the big circle

The perimeter of a circle is calculated using

Perimeter = 2πr

P = 2πR

P = 2π × 8√3

P = 16π√3 in

So the correct option is C

P = 16√3 π in.

notsponge [240]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

C. 16√3π in.

Step-by-step explanation:

Circumference of a circle = 2πr where

r is the radius of the circle.

Given the area of one of the smaller circle to be 48π in², we can get the radius of one of the smaller circle.

If A = πr²

48π = πr²

r² = 48

r = √48 in

The radius of one of the smaller circle is √48.

To get the circumference of the larger circle, we need the radius of the larger circle. The radius R of the larger circle will be equivalent to the diameter (2r) of one of the smaller circle.

R = 2r

R = 2√48 inches

Since C = 2πR

C = 2π(2√48)

C = 4√48π in

C = 4(√16×3)π in

C = 4(4√3)π in

C = 16√3π in

Thw circumference of the larger circle is 16√3π in.

You might be interested in

Here is the Triangle <br><br> What is the measure of angle A?

Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

45 degree angle

Step-by-step explanation:

Pleeaase correct me if im wrong

3 0

3 years ago

Chip is planning to stay at a hotel that

sesenic [268]

The price should be $36.75

5 0

3 years ago

Reduce the following lambda-calculus term to the normal form. Show all intermediate steps, with one beta reduction at a time. In

QveST [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Reduction to normal from using lambda-reduction:

The given lambda - calculus terms is, (λf. λx. f (f x)) (λy. Y * 3) 2

For the term, (λy. Y * 3) 2, we can substitute the value to the function.

Therefore, applying beta- reduction on "(λy. Y * 3) 2" will return 2*3= 6

So the term becomes,(λf. λx. f (f x)) 6

The first term, (λf. λx. f (f x)) takes a function and an argument, and substitute the argument in the function.

Here it is given that it is possible to substitute the resulting multiplication in the result.

Therefore by applying next level beta - reduction, the term becomes f(f(f(6)) (f x)) which is in normal form.

4 0

3 years ago

What is the recursive rule for the following sequence: -5, -3, -1, 1…

Irina18 [472]

$a_{n}$ = $a_{n-1}$ + 2

So C.

4 0

3 years ago

In a survey of 2065 adults in a certain country conducted during a period of economic uncertainty, 63 % thought that wages paid

LenKa [72]

Answer:

a) D.The interpretation is flawed. No interval has been provided about the population proportion.

b) D.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.

c) A.The interpretation is reasonable.

d) C.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) We are 95 % confident 63 % of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low. Is the interpretation reasonable?

D.The interpretation is flawed. No interval has been provided about the population proportion.

The sample proportion alone will not give us any confidence in estimating the true proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low.

We need a 95% confidence interval to claim that the true proportion is within this interval. In this case, as the margin of error is 4%, the 95% CI is 59% and 67%.

(b) We are 91 % to 99 % confident 63 % of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low. Is the interpretation reasonable?

D.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.

The confidence is set at a fixed value and from that value the confidence interval is estimated. It still uses the sample proportion instead of the confidence interval to estimate the true proportion.

(c) We are 95 % confident the proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low was between 0.59 and 0.67. Is the interpretation reasonable?

A.The interpretation is reasonable.

It uses the right sample data and interpret correctly the meaning of the confidence interval.

(d) In 95 % of samples of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty, the proportion who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low is between 0.59 and 0.67. Is the interpretation reasonable?

C.The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.

This confidence interval is an estimation about the parameter of the population. It doesn't give information to estimate the sampling distribution, as it only has information of one specific sample.

6 0

3 years ago