The complete question is :
Charlie is investigating friction. She will use the same amount of force to push two wooden balls across two level surfaces. Then she will record her results in the table below.
Which prediction will most likely describe how friction will affect her findings?
Answer:
The distance for Trial 3 will be greater than the distance for Trial 4 because the difference in surface roughness will affect friction.
Explanation:
The frictional force depends greatly on the roughness of the body surfaces. It acts opposite to the direction of motion when two body surfaces have a relative motion between them.
In the context, equal mount of force is applied to push the wooden balls. So the net force which acts on the balls are :
F' = F - f
Here, F = the force applied
f = force of friction
And f = μ.N (N = reaction force)
Here μ is the coefficient of friction that depends on the surface roughness. The frictional force will be less when the surfaces are smooth. Thus for the trails 3 and trial 4, the distance for trail 3 would be greater than trail 4 as the surface is polished and would offer less friction.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is A
A batsman is unlikely to score a century in every cricket match. This is an example of "partial reinforcement".
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Unlike constant reinforcement, partial reinforcement is only strengthened during certain times or time ratios, rather than emphasizing the action every single time. This method of arranging reinforcement is also called intermittent reinforcement after certain number of correct answers or certain interval of time. Thus here a batsman donot plan intentionally to make a century in every cricket match, but it goes random. Although when they need to score high on pressure, they force themselves to stretch as much possible which is not general.
A non renewable resource wouldn't replenish naturally like, oil.
A renewable resource is something that can replenish naturally, like wood or wool.
Answer:
The short is recessive and the tall is dominant
Explanation:
The Punnett Square would look like this (T - tall, t - short):
<u> | T | T |</u>
<u> t | Tt | Tt |</u>
<u> t | Tt | Tt |</u>
<u />
All offspring carry the short gene, but the tall gene is dominant, so the plants are tall with the possibility of having short offspring of their own.
