All categories

3 years ago

Round 34.4653370764 to the nearest whole number

Mathematics

2 answers:

givi [52]3 years ago

8 0

Well, i would say 34.

marysya [2.9K]3 years ago

7 0

That would be 34

Because the first decimal place contains 4.

You might be interested in

In a science class students learn that friction is the resistance to motion when two objects rub together the students decide to

Aleonysh [2.5K]

Which surface has the most friction?

5 0

4 years ago

I need ASAP 7r - 6 = 14

Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

$r=\frac{20}{7}$

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Simplify the following expression.<br> 5 [13 + 10 = (3 + 2)] + 9 x 2

Sergio [31]

Answer:

i BELIEVE ITS

Step-by-step explanation:

5 [13 + 10 = (3 + 2)] + 9 x 2

65+50=25+18

115=43

7 0

3 years ago

In a right triangle the measures of the two smaller angles are (3x+6) and (2x+1) find the measure of the smaller angle in the tr

Lina20 [59]

Well since the triangle is right angled you know that the given angles sum to 90........(angle sum of a triangle 180, 1 angle = 90) so you can say 3x + 6 + 2x - 1 = 90 or 5x - 5 = 90 now solve for x. the smaller angle will be 2x - 1 so substitute your answer for x and you'll have the measure of the smaller angle. hope that helps

6 0

3 years ago

The true average diameter of ball bearings of a certain type is supposed to be 0.5 in. A one-sample t test will be carried out t

yulyashka [42]

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The population mean is $\mu = 0.5 \ in$

Generally the Null hypothesis is $H_o : \mu = 0. 5 \ in$

The Alternative hypothesis is $H_a : \mu \ne 0.5 \ in$

Considering the parameter given for part a

The sample size is n = 15

The test statistics is t = 1.66

The level of significance $\alpha = 0.05$

The degree of freedom is evaluated as

$df = n- 1$

$df = 15- 1$

$df = 14$

Using the critical value calculator at (social science statistics web site )

$t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} ,df } = t_{\frac{0.05 }{2} ,14} = 2.145$

We are making use of this $t_{\frac{\alpha }{2} }$ because it is a one-tail test

Looking at the value of t and $t_{\frac{\alpha }{2} }$ the we see that $t < t_{\frac{\alpha }{2} }$ so the null hypothesis would not be rejected

Considering the parameter given for part b

The sample size is n = 15

The test statistics is t = -1.66

The level of significance $\alpha = 0.05$

The degree of freedom is evaluated as

$df = n- 1$

$df = 15- 1$

$df = 14$

Using the critical value calculator at (social science statistics web site )

$t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} ,df } = t_{\frac{0.05 }{2} ,14} = -2.145$

Looking at the value of t and $t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} ,df }$ the we see that t does not lie in the area covered by $t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} , df }$ (i.e the area from -2.145 downwards on the normal distribution curve ) hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

Considering the parameter given for part c

The sample size is n = 26

The test statistics is t = -2.55

The level of significance $\alpha = 0.01$

The degree of freedom is evaluated as

$df = n- 1$

$df = 26- 1$

$df = 25$

Using the critical value calculator at (social science statistics web site )

$t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} ,df } = t_{\frac{0.01 }{2} ,25} = 2.787$

Looking at the value of t and $t_{\frac{\alpha }{2} }$ the we see that t does not lie in the area covered by $t_{\alpha , df }$ (i.e the area from -2.787 downwards on the normal distribution curve ) hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

Considering the parameter given for part d

The sample size is n = 26

The test statistics is t = -3.95

The level of significance $\alpha = 0.01$

The degree of freedom is evaluated as

$df = n- 1$

$df = 26- 1$

$df = 25$

Using the critical value calculator at (social science statistics web site )

$t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} ,df } = t_{\frac{0.01 }{2} ,25} = -2.787$

Looking at the value of t and $t_{\frac{\alpha}{2} }$ the we see that t lies in the area covered by $t_{\alpha , df }$ (i.e the area from -2.787 downwards on the normal distribution curve ) hence we reject the null hypothesis

6 0

3 years ago