Answer:
(a) and (b) are not true in general. Refer to the explanations below for counterexamples.
It can be shown that (c) is indeed true.
Step-by-step explanation:
This explanation will use a lot of empty sets just to keep the counterexamples simple.
<h3>(a)</h3>
Note that can well be smaller than . It should be alarming that the question is claiming to be a subset of something that can be smaller than . Here's a counterexample that dramatize this observation:
Consider:
- .
- (an empty set, same as .)
- (another empty set.)
The intersection of an empty set with another set should still be an empty set:
.
The union of two empty sets should also be an empty set:
.
Apparently, the one-element set isn't a subset of an empty set. . Contradiction.
<h3>(b)</h3>
Consider the same counterexample
- .
- (an empty set, same as .)
- (another empty set.)
Left-hand side:
.
Right-hand side:
.
Apparently, the empty set on the left-hand side is not the same as the on the right-hand side. Contradiction.
<h3>(c)</h3>
Part one: show that left-hand side is a subset of the right-hand side.
Let be a member of the set on the left-hand side.
.
and (the right arrow here reads "implies".)
and and .
and .
.
Note that (set on the left-hand side) implies that (set on the right-hand side.)
Therefore:
.
Part two: show that the right-hand side is a subset of the left-hand side. This part is slightly more involved than the first part.
Let be a member of the set on the right-hand side.
.
and .
Note that is equivalent to:
However, implies that AND .
The fact that means that the only possibility that is .
To reiterate: if , then the assumption that would not be true any more. Therefore, the only possibility is that .
Therefore, .
In other words, .
.
Combine these two parts to obtain: .