Answer:
The true option is "This is not plagiarism"
Explanation:
It is very common when we are making reference to a material written previously to cross that thin line that divides paraphrasing from Plagiarism, to avoid committing the serious offense of plagiarising others work, people have to re-write the information with their own words, this is an example of paraphrasing without plagiarism since it keeps the same idea but with a different writing style.
If the main speaker goes out during the production, there should be speakers as Auxiliary speakers as backup.
Answer:
The structure affects the characters' fates and actions
Explanation:
We live a loose structure everyday, however slightly changing that unknown structure may change our fate. For example, one may have a choice between chocolate or mint ice cream and let's say that certain someone was unaware of the recent callback on all mint ice cream. Choosing the mint ice cream will most likely lead to sickness and therefore, changing the fate for those two hours of sitting on a toilet instead of accomplishing something great.
I think the supporting material in this speech is poor. The student gives a lot of information about statistics, which is very helpful, but doesn't give details about which organisms studied the topic. Where did the student found these statistics? Who did them? Are they specialized in the subject?
The student mentions the doctors by saying "many doctors". Who are these doctors, which are their names, which are their specialties?
The student after says that there are "<em>other institutions</em>" that suggest that a child whose body weight is at least 20% higher than a child of a similar height is obese. Which are these "<em>other institutions</em>"?
Then, the student takes the discussed issue a little lightly when saying "<em>No matter what the exact definition</em>" after saying how complicated this illness is. Does the student think it is not important to know the exacts definition? If not, who says that?
I think this speech has to have probationary documentation. All these facts and statics mentioned don't have support. The student doesn't name even one of the organizations, doctors, authorities specialized in the subject he or she is referring to.
It is a very serious topic, about a serious disease, and has to be addressed with consciousness. If not, it seems like everything is the student's opinion and we know what he or she is saying is probably true. The student has to name every document he or she read in order to give this information.
