1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
9

All of the following are true of special districts EXCEPT:

History
1 answer:
guajiro [1.7K]3 years ago
5 0
<span>the one that is true of special districts is : D. members of the special districts are created by the citizens and are members of the community Special districts refer to special and unique government units that exist separately with substantial administrative and fiscal separation from the local governments</span>
You might be interested in
What system did the Federal Judiciary
dusya [7]
One of the first acts of the new Congress was to establish a federal court system in the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Constitution provided that the judicial branch should be composed of one Supreme Court and such inferior courts as Congress from time to time established. But unlike the legislative provisions, in which the framers clearly spelled out the powers of the Congress, Article III of the Constitution is rather vague on just what the judicial powers should be.

Congress had little precedent to guide it, since in the British system the three court systems -- Common Pleas (private law), King's Bench (criminal law) and Chancery (equity) -- operated independently, and derived their authority from the King's writ. Even during colonial times, when American courts followed English precedent, the frontier society had been too poor in resources and trained personnel to follow British practice. So Congress had, in essence, a clean slate upon which to write. One of the more imaginative steps was combining law and equity into a single court system, thus providing for a more effective and efficient means of delivering justice.

The debate in Congress centered on how much power the Constitution transferred from the states to the federal government. States' rights activists opposed giving the new courts too much authority, while supporters argued that only a strong federal court system could overcome the weaknesses that had been so apparent during the Confederation period.

Looking back, it is hard to envision how the supremacy of the Constitution provided for in Article VI could possibly have been sustained without a strong federal court system, one empowered to review and, if necessary, overturn state court decisions. Otherwise, the country would have been saddled again with thirteen independent jurisdictions and no means to conform them to a single national standard. "I have never been able to see," James Madison wrote in 1832 commenting on the federal courts, how "the Constitution itself could have been the supreme law of the land; or that the uniformity of Federal authority throughout the parts to it could be preserved; or that without the uniformity, anarchy and disunion could be prevented."

The courts of the United States, as much as the legislative and executive branches, have been instruments of democratic government, binding a diverse people together.

For further reading: D.F. Henderson, Courts for a New Nation (1971); Julius Goebel, Antecedents and Beginnings to 1801 (1971); the first volume of the Holmes Devise, History of the Supreme Court of the United States; and Maeva Marcus, ed., Origins of the Federal Judiciary (1992).
4 0
3 years ago
How is god made this is one of my social studies question and I don’t get it
Degger [83]

talking about me? Country roads, take me home  

To the place I belong  

West Virginia, mountain mama

6 0
3 years ago
As a result of the Battle of Gettysburg,
goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer:

the union won the battle of gettysburg it was acrushing defeat for the confedatecy

Explanation:

i just learned this in history and i only miss two questions out of 15

4 0
2 years ago
How was Christianity transformed during the reign of Constantine?
Westkost [7]

Answer:

Constantine now became the Western Roman emperor. He soon used his power to address the status of Christians, issuing the Edict of Milan in 313. This proclamation legalized Christianity and allowed for freedom of worship throughout the empire. ... In 324, Constantine defeated Licinius and took control of a reunited empire.

6 0
2 years ago
What area of public policy lies exclusively with the federal government?
Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

I think that the answer is OPTION C (Education Policy)

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which Japanese ruler brought Korean and Chinese practices into ancient Japan?
    11·1 answer
  • The framers created Article 5 to ensures that ____________.
    5·1 answer
  • Which word best describes America's foreign policy until the end of the 19th century?
    8·2 answers
  • what is an attraction of the mall called Comercial Galerias in San Salvador? a. childrens swing sets b. water slides c. a mansio
    10·1 answer
  • How did the British start/effect the American Revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was Thomas Paine significant
    12·2 answers
  • Is it true that Many sharecroppers were kept in poverty by high rent costs?
    5·1 answer
  • Now go back to Article I to find out more about Congress. How old would you have to be to serve in the House of Representatives?
    8·1 answer
  • What were the effects of slavery on the Atlantic coast?​
    14·1 answer
  • In 5-7 sentences, describe the life of Germans after WW1? Make sure to use at least 1 piece of evidence from the text.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!