Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
The correct answer is B) gave the government too large a role in the economy.
The main reason Democrats opposed the American system gave the government too large a role in the economy.
We are talking about the idea of Senator Henry Clay to implement the "American System." The Democrats totally opposed his project because they considered that the system gave the federal government a big role and more power to intervene in the American economy.
Clay's American System included a special tariff that aimed to over-protect the industry of the United States, federal subsidies to improve the American infrastructure such as roads and public services, and the creation of a national bank to impulse trade.
Answer:
The absence of armed fight against the mother country (Spain and Portugal), and the result of each independence.
Explanation:
The main characteristic of the independence movements of the Spanish colonies is that in almost all there was a war between the colonists and colonizers that dragged on for some years and ended with the victory of the colonists. It was like that in Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, and Bolivia. In Brazil, <u><em>there were several conflicts during the Independence process, but none directly influenced the Declaration of Independence.</em></u>
The main difference between the Independence movements of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile is the result achieved by each country. In Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, declarations of Independence took these countries directly to the republican regime, while <u><em>in Brazil there was only a political break with the metropolis maintaining the entire system that was in force during the colony.</em></u>
The correct answer for this question is this one: "B) widespread use of public transportation." Prior to WWII, people living in cities in the United States enjoyed widespread use of public transportation.
Here are the following choices:A) a housing boom.
B) widespread use of public transportation.
C) increasing quality of public housing.
D) improving air quality.
Answer:
Ethos
Explanation:
He uses his authority and expertise to appeal to readers. Pathos: He appeals to readers' emotions. Allusion: He references God to appeal to the religious morals of his readers/listeners. hope this helps you :)
