Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer:
no we do not stop it cause its good to us so we know the globe
Answer:
Lesser
Explanation:
Jihad in Arabic means striving or struggling, conforming one individual's life with Gods guidelines and fighting unbelievers.
The greater (inner) Jihad refers to the internal struggle against one's own vices. The external (lesser) jihad refers to the armed struggle, it is also called the jihad of the sward. It is the fulfillment of Islam's commands and duties.
The external (inner ) jihad has been subject to many controversies as it is seen by many as an incentive to spread religious hatred and war.
Answer:
Accidental errors.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, a random/accidental error remains in after mistakes and have been eliminated. They are caused by factors beyond the control of the observer. They are present in all surveying observations. This type of error usually result from human mistakes or accidental errors. The latter type are errors caused by changing experimental conditions, out of the control of the individual doing the study or experiment. It's hard to quantify how "disastrous" they can be given that most of the times it depends on the context of the study.
