1. <span>It let people ride to work so they could live further away from their jobs.
</span><span>
2. </span>Disease, fire, and crime.
3. It's a tricky question but this refers to majority, so the answer is "<span>They came through Ellis Island on the East Coast."
4. This is also a tricky one, but the answer is "</span>It established the idea of "Separate", but equal."
C i think is the right answer
The given statement is true.
Explanation:
In the given context Carrie is using non verbal communication to regulate interaction. When two person are in conversation and one of them is not confident enough or pretty much sure about answering or reacting in a question or in a situation at that time he used to follow sign languages in terms of eye contact occasionally or nodding intently or sometimes ask question to the speaker.
Non verbal communication is popular to regulate interaction in an effective way where verbal communication is not working properly due to lack of confidence or little knowledge.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
individualization, purposeful expression of feelings, controlled emotional involvement, acceptance, non-judgmental attitude, client self-deter- mination, and confidentiality
Explanation:
:)
