Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Have in mind the definition of the term 
, and now work on what the term 
is based on the previous definition:
In the next step do NOT combine the numerical values, but try to identify the 
term (
) in the expression (notice the use of square brackets to group the relevant terms):
![a_{n+1}=4\,n+4-1\\a_{n+1}=[4\,n-1]+4\\a_{n+1}=a_n+4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a_%7Bn%2B1%7D%3D4%5C%2Cn%2B4-1%5C%5Ca_%7Bn%2B1%7D%3D%5B4%5C%2Cn-1%5D%2B4%5C%5Ca_%7Bn%2B1%7D%3Da_n%2B4)
So now we have the term "" defined in a recursive manner based on the previous term ""
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
There is definetly a whole number so thats correct
1. subtract 4 from 6 equals 2
2. turn that 4 to a 1 whole and leave what's alone
3. Look at what you did... 1 2/4
4. Take pride
Answer: 8.7 x 5.28
We have to find that expression , which has an estimated product of
1.→44.7 x 2.1
2.→7.5 x 8.4
3.→8.7 x 5.28
4.→38.1 x 7.3
We will start from option 1.
→44.7 x 2.1
44.7 when estimated to nearest tenth=45
2.1, when estimated to nearest tenth=2
44.7 × 2.1=45×2=90
Option 2
7.5 x 8.4
7.5 when estimated to nearest tenth=8
8.4, when estimated to nearest tenth=8
⇒7.5 × 8.4=8×8=64
Option 3
8.7 × 5.28
8.7, when estimated to nearest tenth=9
5.28, when estimated to nearest tenth=5
⇒8.7 × 5.28=9×5=45
Option D
38.1 × 7.3
38.1 when estimated to nearest tenth=38
7.3, when estimated to nearest tenth=7
⇒38×7=266
Option C:⇒8.7 × 5.28 has an estimated product of 45
Answer:
The following shape is not a rectangle, but a square. I know this because the length and width are the same amount of square inch(feet, what ever the square counts for on your graph.) and rectangles width are typically longer than their length. However a square shares the same length and width,
Step-by-step explanation:
