1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
4 years ago
13

Why doesn't the universe collapse under the force of gravity? Please tell where you got the information from and if it is correc

t, you'll get points! :3
Chemistry
2 answers:
Sergio [31]4 years ago
8 0
First, this would go under physics. 

Gravity is a relatively weak force and depends on the mass and distance of two objects. Even between insects, the force of gravity exists. However, it is not strong enough to be present because the two masses are too small and too far away.

Here is a Harvard question that is similar.
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/faq.htm
If the universe started out so dense, why didn't it collapse into a black hole?
A large enough clump of matter will collapse to form a black hole, but ONLY if it is surrounded by (relatively) empty space. During the Big Bang, there WAS NO empty space: ALL of space was filled more or less uniformly with matter and energy; there was no "center of attraction" around which matter could coalesce. Under these circumstances, a cosmic-scale black hole will not form (and lucky for us!).
liberstina [14]4 years ago
7 0
According to Newton's 3rd law if body a exerts a force them body b exerts a force that is equal but opposite. Therefore the universe exerts a force on everything that is inside the universe and the moon,planet, stars etc. exerts a force back on the universe.

According to http://www.kickassfacts.com/askus-after-the-big-bang-why-didnt-the-universe-re-collapse-under-its-own-self-gravity/


"It certainly slowed down under its own gravity, but not enough to recollapse.

There’s a very simple (and almost exact) analogy. Let’s represent the Big Bang by launching a rocket. For our purposes, it isn’t propelled at all after the moment of launch, but of course, initially it’s shot up at some very high speed. Your question is exactly analogous to asking why the rocket didn’t fall back down to the Earth.

The answer is that the rocket was launched with an initial speed greater than or equal to the Earth’s escape velocity. As the rocket moves up, gravity does slow it down, but gravity also gets weaker. Escape velocity is the speed where gravity weakens more quickly than it can slow the rocket to a halt. So even though the Earth’s gravity is certainly slowing it down as it goes up, it never slows it down so much that it stops and falls back down to the ground.

We can map this answer directly onto the expanding Universe. Why hasn’t it recollapsed under its own gravity? Because even though the gravity of all the matter and energy in the Universe does cause the expansion to slow down (or at least did, until recently), it was initially expanding so quickly that, like a rocket moving up at escape velocity, it never slowed down quite enough to stop and recollapse."

You might be interested in
What type of compound is Calcium phosphide?
Maru [420]

Answer:

Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa). Calcium phosphide (CP) is the inorganic compound with the formula Ca3P2. It is one of several phosphides of calcium, being described as the salt-like material composed of Ca2+ and P3−.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What volume would 3.01•1023 molecules of oxygen gas occupy at STP?
frosja888 [35]
<h3>Answer:</h3>

                  Volume  = 11.2 L

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

Step 1: Calculate Moles:

                      As we know one mole of any substance contains 6.022 × 10²³ particles (atoms, ions, molecules or formula units). This number is also called as Avogadro's Number.

The relation between Moles, Number of Particles and Avogadro's Number is given as,

                          Number of Moles  =  Number of Particles ÷ 6.022 × 10²³

Putting values,

                          Number of Moles  =  3.01× 10²³ Particles ÷ 6.022 × 10²³

                          Number of Moles  =  0.50 Moles

Step 2: Calculate Volume:

As we know that one mole of any Ideal gas at standard temperature and pressure occupies exactly 22.4 dm³ volume.

When 1 mole gas occupies 22.4 dm³ at STP then the volume occupied by 0.50 moles of gas is calculated as,

                      = (22.4 dm³ × 0.50 moles) ÷ 1 mole

                      = 11.2 dm³                                       ∴ 1dm³ = 1 L

So,

                                      Volume  = 11.2 L

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A liquid has a mass of 40.24g and a volume of 50.0mL. What is its density?
Musya8 [376]
P=m/V

m=40.24 g
V=50.0 mL=50.0 cm³

p=40.24/50.0=0.8048 g/cm³
7 0
4 years ago
What is the standard potential, e∘celle∘cell, for this galvanic cell? use the given standard reduction potentials in your calcul
Olin [163]

The standard potential for the given galvanic cell is 0.477 V

<h3>What is electrode potential?</h3>

The electrode potential is the electromotive force of a galvanic cell built using a standard reference electrode and another electrode whose potential is to be found.

There are two types of electrode potential

Oxidation potential - The potential associated with oxidation reaction is known as oxidation potential

Reduction potential - The potential associated with reduction reaction is known as reduction potential

At the anode, oxidation occurs

Sn(s)\rightarrow Sn^{2+}(aq)+2e^-

At the cathode, reduction occurs

Cu^{2+}(aq)+2e^-\rightarrow Cu(s)

E^o_{cell} =E^o_{cathode} -E^o_{anode}

        = 0.337 - (-0.140)

        = 0.477 V

Thus, The standard potential for the given galvanic cell is 0.477 V

Learn more about electrode potential:

brainly.com/question/17362810

#SPJ4

Disclaimer: The question was given incomplete on the portal. Here is the complete question

Question: What is the standard potential, E∘cell, for this galvanic cell? Use the given standard reduction potentials in your calculation as appropriate.

Sn^{2+}(aq)+2e^-\rightarrow Sn(s), E°red=−0.140 V

Cu^{2+}(aq)+2e^-\rightarrow Cu(s), E°red=+0.337 V

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many grams of O2 are produced as 0.033 mol of water decompose
PolarNik [594]

Answer:  This can be quickly solved with "traintracks"

Explanation:

You start w/ grams of water and want to find moles of oxygen gas produced.  

So you want to Convert:  

Grams of water -> moles of water -> moles of oxygen gas.  

The two things you need to know to set up the tracks are:  

1)Molar mass of water- H2O  

Hydrogen - 1.008(x2)  

Oxygen - 16.00  

Water - 18.016

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A 74.0-gram piece of metal at 94.0 °C is placed in 120.0 g of water in a calorimeter at 26.5 °C. The final temperature in the ca
    12·1 answer
  • What part of the atom is involved in a chemical reaction?
    8·1 answer
  • In an atomic model that includes a nucleus, negative charge is
    10·1 answer
  • Ba(CN) _<br> What is the compound
    13·1 answer
  • Name the following compounds
    7·2 answers
  • Solid potassium chlorate (KClO3)(KClO3) decomposes into potassium chloride and oxygen gas when heated. How many moles of oxygen
    13·1 answer
  • THIS IS URGENT PLEASE HELPPPPPP (NO LINKS PLEASE)
    5·1 answer
  • Give the location in the Periodic Table of Elements that have the same number of valence electrons.
    6·1 answer
  • A student accidentally drops the watch glass atop the evaporating dish containing the
    11·1 answer
  • Identify the classification of milk. group of answer choices aerosol solid aerosol foam emulsion solid emulsion
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!