Answer:
In the given case study, the reliability of internet sources can not be trusted and possibilities are that such sources are biased.
Explanation:
Poaching is an illegal act of hunting or trapping of animals. So, internet sources that the grade 4 learners came across can not be trusted. The reliability of the blog can not be trusted as it supports the poaching system and confirms it to be a source of funding to animals. Since poaching an illegal act a blog that claims to support such an act would be unreliable and biased.
<u>For the fact, all internet sources can not be relied upon because not all of them assures good quality of information, their accuracy can not be trusted. Some sources are biased also. This problem arises because now people have access to post anything on the internet whether reliable or not</u>.
Answer: ok but what is it is it zoom or something
Explanation:
Answer:
Either A or B but I'm thinking more B than A
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer: If Sheila had a reasonable belief that she was telling the truth, Jacobi can rescind the contract, but he cannot collect damages.
Explanation: From the given text it can be concluded that Sheila did not intend to deceive Jacobi, that is, she was telling the truth when she claimed that the sofas were in good condition, except that the only issue was that the fabric on the sofas was slightly worn. Because this is an unintentional mistake, that is, Sheila's claim that everything else with the sofas is okay, Jacobi can rescind the contract but cannot collect damages.
Answer:
yes. yes they are delicious U-U
Explanation:
