1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nalin [4]
3 years ago
14

6 • (4 + 2)2 – 32 answer.

Mathematics
1 answer:
SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago
4 0

This is a classic order of operations question

I always remember order of operations as PEMDAS, or

Parentheses

Exponents

Multiplication

Division

Addition

Subtraction

That is the order to do items, from left to right. Multiplication and decision take place at the same time, as do addition and subtraction

So lets look at your problem: 6 • (4 + 2)² – 32

The first thing to do is what is in the parentheses, the 4 + 2

6 • (6)² – 32

The 2nd thing is the exponent

6 • 36 – 32

Next we do the multiplication

216 - 32

And finally the subtraction, leaving us with

184

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
What do you need to know to describe the velocity of an object?--Three things total
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

Distance traveled, initial speed, and final sped.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Please give me an answer
adoni [48]
Express 0.31 as a fraction and express 0.2 as a fraction
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help if possible :)
n200080 [17]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (a) no

  (b) no

Step-by-step explanation:

The two questions are asking essentially the same thing. There is nothing that indicates DC ≅ DB or that AC ≅ AB. One (both) of these conditions is (are) required for ΔBAC to be isosceles, so that AD is both a perpendicular bisector of BC and a bisector of angle BAC.

There is not enough information to answer either question affirmatively.

8 0
3 years ago
ASAP PLEASE please please
Aleksandr [31]

{ \qquad\qquad\huge\underline{{\sf Answer}}}

Let's solve ~

\qquad \sf  \dashrightarrow \:  \cfrac{1}{b}  + 10 =  \cfrac{9}{b}  + 7

\qquad \sf  \dashrightarrow \:  \cfrac{9}{b}  -   \cfrac{1}{b} =  10 -   7

\qquad \sf  \dashrightarrow \:  \cfrac{8}{b}   =  3

\qquad \sf  \dashrightarrow \: b =  \cfrac{8}{3}

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the next number in the sequence 5 10 3 15 20 13 25 30?
    15·1 answer
  • In the diagram below AB is parallel to CD what is the value of X?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a correct interpretation of the expression -4 - (-7)?
    10·2 answers
  • Jenny and her brother are arguing about who will get the larger peace of cake. They decided to have a coin toss. What is the pos
    12·2 answers
  • Simplify using order of operations<br>5.8-7.2+4.6^2
    10·2 answers
  • Which situation represents a proportional relationship?
    10·1 answer
  • The length of a rectangle is 6 inches longer than it is wide. If the area is 55 square inches, what are the dimensions of the re
    13·1 answer
  • Solve for y then find the value of x. y+6x=11;x=-1,0,3
    7·2 answers
  • Brainliest if you show all work!!!<br><br> Thanks! :)
    8·1 answer
  • Long division:<br> (2x² - 5x - 3) ÷ (x - 3)
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!